Jutte Paul C, van Loenhout-Rooyackers Joke H
University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25(5):CD004532. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004532.pub2.
Tuberculosis is generally curable with chemotherapy, but there is controversy in the literature about the need for surgical intervention in the one to two per cent of people with tuberculosis of the spine.
To compare chemotherapy plus surgery with chemotherapy alone for treating people diagnosed with active tuberculosis of the spine.
We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register (February 2010), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2010,Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2010), EMBASE (1974 to February 2010), LILACS (1982 to February 2010), conference proceedings, and reference lists. A search update in November 2012 revealed no new studies.
Randomized controlled trials with at least one year follow up that compared chemotherapy plus surgery with chemotherapy alone for treating active tuberculosis of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine.
Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality, and extracted data.We analysed data using odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals.
Two randomized controlled trials (331 participants) met the inclusion criteria. They were conducted in the 1970s and 1980s with follow-up reports available after 18 months, three years, and five years; one trial also reported 10 years follow up. Completeness of follow up varied at the different time points, with less than 80% of participants available for analysis at several time points. There was no statistically significant difference for any of the outcome measures: kyphosis angle, neurological deficit (none went on to develop this), bony fusion, absence of spinal tuberculosis, death from any cause, activity level regained, change of allocated treatment, or bone loss. Neither trial reported on pain. Of the 130 participants allocated to chemotherapy only, 12 had a neurological deficit and five needed a decompression operation. One trial suggested that an initial kyphosis angle greater than 30° is likely to deteriorate, especially in children.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The two included trials had too few participants to be able to say whether routine surgery might help. Although current medication and operative techniques are now far more advanced, these results indicate that routine surgery cannot be recommended unless within the context of a large, well-conducted randomized controlled trial. Clinicians may judge that surgery may be clinically indicated in some groups of patients. Future studies need to address these topics as well as the patient's view of their disease and treatment.
结核病通常可用化疗治愈,但对于脊柱结核患者中1%至2%的人群是否需要手术干预,文献中存在争议。
比较化疗联合手术与单纯化疗治疗确诊为活动性脊柱结核的患者的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane传染病小组专业注册库(2010年2月)、CENTRAL(Cochrane图书馆2010年第1期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2010年2月)、EMBASE(1974年至2010年2月)、LILACS(1982年至2010年2月)、会议论文集及参考文献列表。2012年11月的检索更新未发现新的研究。
至少随访一年的随机对照试验,比较化疗联合手术与单纯化疗治疗胸段和/或腰段活动性脊柱结核的疗效。
两位作者独立评估试验的入选资格、方法学质量并提取数据。我们采用比值比及95%置信区间分析数据。
两项随机对照试验(331名参与者)符合纳入标准。这两项试验于20世纪70年代和80年代进行,随访报告时间为18个月、三年及五年,其中一项试验还报告了10年随访结果。不同时间点的随访完整性各不相同,在几个时间点上,可供分析的参与者不足80%。在任何结局指标上均无统计学显著差异:后凸角度、神经功能缺损(均未发展为此情况)、骨融合、脊柱结核消失、任何原因导致的死亡、恢复的活动水平、分配治疗的改变或骨质流失。两项试验均未报告疼痛情况。在仅接受化疗的130名参与者中,12人出现神经功能缺损,5人需要进行减压手术。一项试验表明,初始后凸角度大于30°的患者可能病情恶化,尤其是儿童。
纳入的两项试验参与者过少,无法确定常规手术是否有益。尽管目前的药物和手术技术已大为先进,但这些结果表明,除非在大规模、精心实施的随机对照试验背景下,否则不建议进行常规手术。临床医生可能认为在某些患者群体中手术可能具有临床指征。未来的研究需要探讨这些问题以及患者对其疾病和治疗的看法。