Moudi Zahra, Ghazi Tabatabaie Mahmood, Mahdi Tabatabaei Seyed, Vedadhir AbouAli
Pregnancy Health Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Science, Midwifery Department, Nursing and Midwifery School, Mashahir Square, Zahedan, Iran.
Department of Demography & Population Studies, Faculty of Social Science, University of Tehran, Tehran 14395-773, Iran.
Midwifery. 2014 Oct;30(10):1073-81. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
Recently, there has been a shift towards alternative childbirth services to increase access to skilled care during childbirth.
This study aims to assess the past 10 years of experience of the first Safe Delivery Posts (SDPs) established in Zahedan, Iran to determine the number of deliveries and the intrapartum transfer rates, and to examine the reasons why women choose to give birth at a Safe Delivery Post and not in one of the four large hospitals in Zahedan.
A mixed-methods research strategy was used for this study. In the quantitative phase, an analysis was performed on the existing data that are routinely collected in the health-care sector. In the qualitative phase, a grounded theory approach was used to collect and analyse narrative data from in-depth interviews with women who had given birth to their children at the Safe Delivery Posts.
Women were selected from two Safe Delivery Posts in Zahedan city in southeast Iran.
Nineteen mothers who had given birth in the Safe Delivery Posts were interviewed.
During the 10-year period, 22,753 low-risk women gave birth in the Safe Delivery Posts, according to the records. Of all the women who were admitted to the Safe Delivery Posts, on average 2.1% were transferred to the hospital during labour or the postpartum period. Three key categories emerged from the analysis: barriers to hospital use, opposition to home birth and finally, reasons for choosing the childbirth care provided by the SDPs.
Implementing a model of midwifery care that offers the benefits of modern medical care and meets the needs of the local population is feasible and sustainable. This model of care reduces the cost of giving birth and ensures equitable access to care among vulnerable groups in Zahedan.
最近,分娩服务正朝着替代方案转变,以增加分娩期间获得熟练护理的机会。
本研究旨在评估伊朗扎赫丹设立的首批安全分娩站过去10年的经验,以确定分娩数量和产时转诊率,并探究女性选择在安全分娩站而非扎赫丹四家大型医院之一分娩的原因。
本研究采用了混合方法研究策略。在定量阶段,对医疗保健部门常规收集的现有数据进行了分析。在定性阶段,采用扎根理论方法收集和分析对在安全分娩站分娩的女性进行深入访谈得到的叙述性数据。
从伊朗东南部扎赫丹市的两个安全分娩站选取女性。
对19名在安全分娩站分娩的母亲进行了访谈。
根据记录,在这10年期间,有22753名低风险女性在安全分娩站分娩。在所有入住安全分娩站的女性中,平均有2.1%在分娩期间或产后被转诊至医院。分析得出三个关键类别:使用医院的障碍、反对在家分娩以及最终选择安全分娩站提供的分娩护理的原因。
实施一种能提供现代医疗护理益处并满足当地人口需求的助产护理模式是可行且可持续的。这种护理模式降低了分娩成本,并确保了扎赫丹弱势群体公平获得护理的机会。