• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关键健康主题和在线新闻文章中报道水烟烟草吸烟的数值香烟-水烟等效性的报告:内容分析。

Key health themes and reporting of numerical cigarette-waterpipe equivalence in online news articles reporting on waterpipe tobacco smoking: a content analysis.

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2015 Jan;24(1):43-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-050981. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-050981
PMID:23868396
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is anecdotal evidence that health messages interpreted from waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) research are inconsistent, such as comparing the health effects of one WTS session with that of 100 cigarettes. This study aimed to identify key health themes about WTS discussed by online news media, and how numerical cigarette-waterpipe equivalence (CWE) was being interpreted.

METHODS

We identified 1065 online news articles published between March 2011 and September 2012 using the 'Google Alerts' service. We screened for health themes, assessed statements mentioning CWE and reported differences between countries. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with articles incorrectly reporting a CWE equal to or greater than 100 cigarettes, in the absence of any comparative parameter ('CWE ≥100 cigarettes').

RESULTS

Commonly mentioned health themes were the presence of tobacco (67%) and being as bad as cigarettes (49%), and we report on differences between countries. While 10.8% of all news articles contained at least one positive health theme, 22.9% contained a statement about a CWE. Most of these (18.6% total) were incorrectly a CWE ≥100 cigarettes, a quarter of which were made by healthcare professionals/organisations. Compared with the Middle East, articles from the USA and the UK were the most significant predictors to contain a CWE ≥100 cigarettes statement.

CONCLUSIONS

Those wishing to write or publish information related to WTS may wish to avoid comparing WTS to cigarettes using numerical values as this is a major source of confusion. Future research is needed to address the impact of the media on the attitudes, initiation and cessation rates of waterpipe smokers.

摘要

简介

有传闻证据表明,从水烟烟草吸烟(WTS)研究中得出的健康信息不一致,例如将一次 WTS 疗程的健康影响与 100 支香烟进行比较。本研究旨在确定在线新闻媒体讨论的关于 WTS 的关键健康主题,以及如何解释数字香烟-水烟等效物(CWE)。

方法

我们使用“Google Alerts”服务,于 2011 年 3 月至 2012 年 9 月期间识别了 1065 篇在线新闻文章。我们筛选出健康主题,评估了提到 CWE 的陈述,并报告了国家之间的差异。我们使用逻辑回归来确定在没有任何比较参数的情况下,不正确报告 CWE 等于或大于 100 支香烟的文章的相关因素(“CWE≥100 支香烟”)。

结果

通常提到的健康主题是存在烟草(67%)和与香烟一样有害(49%),我们报告了国家之间的差异。虽然所有新闻文章中有 10.8%至少包含一个积极的健康主题,但有 22.9%包含关于 CWE 的陈述。这些陈述中大多数(总共 18.6%)是不正确的 CWE≥100 支香烟,其中四分之一是由医疗保健专业人员/组织发表的。与中东相比,来自美国和英国的文章是包含 CWE≥100 支香烟陈述的最显著预测因素。

结论

那些希望撰写或发布与 WTS 相关的信息的人可能希望避免使用数值来比较 WTS 和香烟,因为这是造成混淆的主要原因。需要进一步研究以解决媒体对水烟吸烟者的态度、开始和戒烟率的影响。

相似文献

1
Key health themes and reporting of numerical cigarette-waterpipe equivalence in online news articles reporting on waterpipe tobacco smoking: a content analysis.关键健康主题和在线新闻文章中报道水烟烟草吸烟的数值香烟-水烟等效性的报告:内容分析。
Tob Control. 2015 Jan;24(1):43-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-050981. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
2
Waterpipe and cigarette tobacco smoking among Palestinian university students: a cross-sectional study.巴勒斯坦大学生中的水烟和香烟吸食情况:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 10;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4524-0.
3
Waterpipe tobacco smoking legislation and policy enactment: a global analysis.水烟吸烟立法与政策制定:一项全球分析。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i60-i65. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051911. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
4
How popular is waterpipe tobacco smoking? Findings from internet search queries.水烟吸食的流行程度如何?来自互联网搜索查询的结果。
Tob Control. 2015 Sep;24(5):509-13. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051675. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
5
Waterpipe tobacco smoking in healthcare students in the University of Jordan.约旦大学医学生中的水烟吸食情况。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;13:1576868. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1576868. eCollection 2025.
6
To what extent should waterpipe tobacco smoking become a public health priority?水烟烟草吸烟在何种程度上应成为公共卫生重点?
Addiction. 2013 Nov;108(11):1873-84. doi: 10.1111/add.12265. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
7
Tobacco and electronic cigarette products: awareness, cessation attitudes, and behaviours among general practitioners.烟草与电子烟产品:全科医生的认知、戒烟态度及行为
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Nov;19(6):605-609. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000166. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
8
Impact of pictorial health warning labels on smoking beliefs and perceptions among waterpipe smokers: an online randomised cross-over experimental study.图片健康警示标签对水烟吸烟者吸烟信念和认知的影响:一项在线随机交叉实验研究。
Tob Control. 2023 Nov;32(6):715-722. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057202. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
9
Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards waterpipe tobacco smoking and electronic shisha (e-shisha) among young adults in London: a qualitative analysis.伦敦年轻人对水烟和电子水烟(电子烟)的认知、态度及信念:一项定性分析
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Mar;17(2):166-74. doi: 10.1017/S1463423615000237. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
10
Parental smoking and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke are associated with waterpipe smoking among youth: results from a national survey in Lebanon.父母吸烟及接触环境烟草烟雾与青少年水烟吸食有关:黎巴嫩一项全国性调查的结果
Public Health. 2015 Apr;129(4):370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Effects of Waterpipe Tobacco Use: Getting the Public Health Message Just Right.水烟吸食对健康的影响:精准传达公共卫生信息。
Tob Use Insights. 2017 Apr 11;10:1179173X17696055. doi: 10.1177/1179173X17696055. eCollection 2017.
2
Health promotion in the poly-tobacco market.
J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;40(4):682-683. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9864-9. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
3
Impact of Waterpipe Tobacco Pack Health Warnings on Waterpipe Smoking Attitudes: A Qualitative Analysis among Regular Users in London.水烟烟草包装健康警告对水烟吸食态度的影响:伦敦普通使用者的定性分析
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:745865. doi: 10.1155/2015/745865. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
4
Social Media Use for Public Health Campaigning in a Low Resource Setting: The Case of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking.低资源环境下利用社交媒体开展公共卫生运动:以水烟吸食为例。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:562586. doi: 10.1155/2015/562586. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
5
Use & Misuse of Water-filtered Tobacco Smoking Pipes in the World. Consequences for Public Health, Research & Research Ethics.全球水过滤式烟斗的使用与滥用。对公众健康、研究及研究伦理的影响。
Open Med Chem J. 2015 Feb 27;9:1-12. doi: 10.2174/1874104501509010001. eCollection 2015.
6
Waterpipe tobacco smoking legislation and policy enactment: a global analysis.水烟吸烟立法与政策制定:一项全球分析。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i60-i65. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051911. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
7
Waterpipe tobacco smoking: what is the evidence that it supports nicotine/tobacco dependence?水烟吸食:其支持尼古丁/烟草依赖的证据有哪些?
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i44-i53. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051910. Epub 2014 Dec 9.