Suppr超能文献

网片开放式修复腹股沟疝时使用胶黏剂与缝线固定的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Glue versus suture fixation of mesh during open repair of inguinal hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2013 Oct;37(10):2282-92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2140-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glue fixation of mesh has been explored for some time as a strategy for reducing postoperative chronic groin pain. Previous studies have come to different conclusions about the superiority of one method over another. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing the performance of glue versus suture fixation of mesh in open inguinal hernioplasty.

METHODS

Studies published up to November 2012 were searched using PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and the international standard randomised controlled trials number (ISRCTN) register. Mean differences (MDs) were derived from secondary continuous outcomes and pooled risk ratios (RRs) for categoric outcomes. Meta-analysis was conducted utilizing the random-effects and fixed-effects models as appropriate.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled studies were selected, with a total of 1,623 patients. Glue fixation for open inguinal hernioplasty reduced chronic groin pain (RR 0.46, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.97), hematoma (RR 0.56, 95 % CI 0.34-0.90), acute postoperative pain (MD -7.92, 95 % CI, -13.17 to -2.66), and time taken to return to normal activities (MD -1.39, 95 % CI, -2.58 to -0.21). There was no evidence of an increase in adverse outcomes including recurrence with glue fixation (RR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.30-2.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Glue fixation of mesh for open inguinal hernioplasty is superior in many outcomes including the reduction of chronic groin pain. Glue fixation was not associated with an increased risk of hernia recurrence.

摘要

背景

一段时间以来,人们一直在探索使用胶合剂固定网片的方法,以减少术后慢性腹股沟疼痛。此前的研究对于一种方法相对于另一种方法的优越性得出了不同的结论。我们对比较开放式腹股沟疝修补术中网片胶合剂固定与缝线固定的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析。

方法

检索了截至 2012 年 11 月发表的文献,检索源包括 PubMed、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN)登记处。从次要连续性结局中提取均值差(MD),并对分类结局进行汇总风险比(RR)。根据需要,使用随机效应和固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

共选择了 10 项随机对照研究,共有 1623 例患者。与缝线固定相比,开放式腹股沟疝修补术中使用胶合剂固定可减少慢性腹股沟疼痛(RR 0.46,95 %置信区间(CI)0.22-0.97)、血肿(RR 0.56,95 % CI 0.34-0.90)、急性术后疼痛(MD-7.92,95 % CI,-13.17 至-2.66)和恢复正常活动所需的时间(MD-1.39,95 % CI,-2.58 至-0.21)。使用胶合剂固定并未增加不良结局的风险,包括复发(RR 0.83,95 % CI 0.30-2.35)。

结论

与缝线固定相比,开放式腹股沟疝修补术中使用胶合剂固定网片在许多结局方面具有优势,包括慢性腹股沟疼痛的减轻。胶合剂固定与疝复发的风险增加无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验