Baldini Enke, Lori Eleonora, Morini Carola, Palla Luigi, Coletta Diego, De Luca Giuseppe M, Giraudo Giorgio, Intini Sergio G, Perotti Bruno, Sorge Angelo, Sozio Giampaolo, Arganini Marco, Beltrami Elsa, Pironi Daniele, Ranalli Massimo, Saviano Cecilia, Patriti Alberto, Usai Sofia, Vernaccini Nicola, Vittore Francesco, D'Andrea Vito, Nardi Priscilla, Sorrenti Salvatore, Palumbo Piergaspare
Department of Surgery, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 19;13(2):589. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020589.
Currently, groin hernia repair is mostly performed with application of mesh prostheses fixed with or without suture. However, views on safety and efficacy of different surgical approaches are still partly discordant. In this multicentre retrospective study, three sutureless procedures, i.e., mesh fixation with glue, application of self-gripping mesh, and Trabucco's technique, were compared in 1034 patients with primary unilateral non-complicated inguinal hernia subjected to open anterior surgery. Patient-related features, comorbidities, and drugs potentially affecting the intervention outcomes were also examined. The incidence of postoperative complications, acute and chronic pain, and time until discharge were assessed. A multivariate logistic regression was used to compare the odds ratio of the surgical techniques adjusting for other risk factors. The application of standard/heavy mesh, performed in the Trabucco's technique, was found to significantly increase the odds ratio of hematomas ( = 0.014) and, most notably, of acute postoperative pain ( < 0.001). Among the clinical parameters, antithrombotic therapy and large hernia size were independent risk factors for hematomas and longer hospital stay, whilst small hernias were an independent predictor of pain. Overall, our findings suggest that the Trabucco's technique should not be preferred in patients with a large hernia and on antithrombotic therapy.
目前,腹股沟疝修补术大多采用应用有或无缝合固定的网片假体来进行。然而,对于不同手术方式的安全性和有效性的观点仍存在部分不一致。在这项多中心回顾性研究中,对1034例接受开放式前路手术的原发性单侧非复杂性腹股沟疝患者,比较了三种无缝合手术方法,即胶水固定网片、应用自固定网片和特拉布科技术。还检查了与患者相关的特征、合并症以及可能影响干预结果的药物。评估了术后并发症、急性和慢性疼痛的发生率以及出院时间。使用多变量逻辑回归来比较调整其他风险因素后的手术技术的优势比。发现在特拉布科技术中应用标准/重型网片会显著增加血肿的优势比( = 0.014),最显著的是术后急性疼痛的优势比( < 0.001)。在临床参数中,抗血栓治疗和大疝大小是血肿和住院时间延长的独立危险因素,而小疝是疼痛的独立预测因素。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,对于大疝患者和接受抗血栓治疗的患者,不应首选特拉布科技术。