University Health Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Cancer. 2013 Aug 1;119 Suppl 15(0 15):2926-39. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28166.
In 2005 through 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded 5 sites to implement a colorectal cancer screening program for uninsured, low-income populations. These 5 sites composed a demonstration project intended to explore the feasibility of establishing a national colorectal cancer screening program through various service delivery models.
A longitudinal, multiple case study was conducted to understand and document program implementation processes. Using metaphor as a qualitative analytic technique, evaluators identified stages of maturation across the programmatic life cycle.
Analysis rendered a working theory of program development during screening implementation. In early stages, program staff built relationships with CDC and local partners around screening readiness, faced real-world challenges putting program policies into practice, revised initial program designs, and developed new professional skills. Midterm implementation was defined by establishing program cohesiveness and expanding programmatic reach. In later stages of implementation, staff focused on sustainability and formal program closeout, which prompted reflection about personal and programmatic accomplishments.
Demonstration sites evolved through common developmental stages during screening implementation. Findings elucidate ways to target technical assistance to more efficiently move programs along their maturation trajectory. In practical terms, the time and cost associated with guiding a program to maturity may be potentially shortened to maximize return on investment for both organizations and clients receiving service benefits.
2005 年至 2009 年,疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)资助了 5 个地点,为没有保险的低收入人群实施结直肠癌筛查计划。这 5 个地点组成了一个示范项目,旨在通过各种服务提供模式探索建立国家结直肠癌筛查计划的可行性。
进行了一项纵向、多案例研究,以了解和记录计划实施过程。评估人员使用隐喻作为一种定性分析技术,确定了计划生命周期中各个阶段的成熟度。
分析得出了筛查实施过程中计划发展的实用理论。在早期阶段,项目工作人员围绕筛查准备情况与疾病预防控制中心和当地合作伙伴建立关系,面对将项目政策付诸实践的现实挑战,修订了最初的项目设计,并发展了新的专业技能。中期实施的特点是建立项目凝聚力和扩大项目范围。在实施的后期阶段,工作人员专注于可持续性和正式的项目结束,这促使他们对个人和项目的成就进行反思。
示范地点在筛查实施过程中经历了共同的发展阶段。研究结果阐明了如何针对技术援助,更有效地推动项目沿着成熟轨迹发展。实际上,指导项目走向成熟所涉及的时间和成本可能会缩短,以最大限度地提高组织和受益客户的投资回报。