Suppr超能文献

评估疾控中心结直肠癌筛查示范项目中的筛查质量。

Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2013 Aug 1;119 Suppl 15(0 15):2834-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28164.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gaps in screening quality in community practice have been well documented. The authors examined recommended indicators of screening quality in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP), which provided colorectal cancer screening and diagnostic services between 2005 and 2009 for asymptomatic, low-income, underinsured, or uninsured individuals at 5 sites around the United States.

METHODS

For each client screened in the CRCSDP, a standardized set of colorectal cancer clinical data elements was collected. Data regarding client age, screening history, risk level, screening test indication, results, and recommendation for the next test were analyzed. For colonoscopies, data were analyzed regarding whether the cecum was reached, bowel preparation was adequate, and identified lesions were completely removed.

RESULTS

Overall, 53% of the fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) (2295 tests) distributed were completed and returned. At the 2 sites with adequate numbers of FOBTs, 77% and 97%, respectively, of clients with positive results received follow-up colonoscopies. Site-specific cecal intubation rates ranged from 90% to 98%. Adenoma detection rates were 32% for men and 21% for women. For approximately one-third of colonoscopies, the recommended interval to the next test was shorter than recommended by national guidelines. At some sites, endoscopists failed to report on the adequacy of bowel preparation and completeness of polyp removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Cecal intubation rates and adenoma detection rates met recommended levels. The authors identified the need for improvements in the follow-up of positive FOBTs, documentation of important elements in colonoscopy reports, and recommendations for rescreening or surveillance intervals after colonoscopy. Monitoring quality indicators is important to improve screening quality.

摘要

背景

社区实践中的筛查质量差距已得到充分证明。作者检查了疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的大肠癌筛查示范计划(CRCSDP)中推荐的筛查质量指标,该计划在 2005 年至 2009 年间为美国各地的 5 个地点的无症状、低收入、保险不足或未保险的个人提供结直肠癌筛查和诊断服务。

方法

在 CRCSDP 中对每个接受筛查的客户,都收集了一套标准化的结直肠癌临床数据元素。分析了客户的年龄、筛查史、风险水平、筛查试验指征、结果以及对下一次检查的建议。对于结肠镜检查,分析了盲肠是否到达、肠道准备是否充分以及识别出的病变是否完全切除。

结果

总体而言,分配的粪便潜血试验(FOBT)(2295 次测试)中有 53%完成并返回。在有足够数量的 FOBT 的 2 个地点,分别有 77%和 97%的阳性结果客户接受了后续结肠镜检查。特定站点的盲肠插管率范围为 90%至 98%。男性的腺瘤检出率为 32%,女性为 21%。大约三分之一的结肠镜检查,建议的下一次检查间隔短于国家指南推荐的间隔。在一些站点,内镜医生未能报告肠道准备的充分性和息肉切除的完整性。

结论

盲肠插管率和腺瘤检出率达到了推荐水平。作者发现需要改进阳性 FOBT 的随访、结肠镜报告中重要元素的记录以及结肠镜检查后重新筛查或监测间隔的建议。监测质量指标对于提高筛查质量很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/4479171/152d68d78b64/nihms701687f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验