Suppr超能文献

急诊科前置式辅助医疗干预并未缩短入住老年患者的住院时间。

Front-loading allied health intervention in the emergency department does not reduce length of stay for admitted older patients.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;67(8):807-10. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12153.

Abstract

AIMS

Allied health intervention may play an important role in the timely discharge of older people admitted to hospital. The impact of early allied health intervention on length of stay has not been quantified. We sought to determine whether early allied health intervention conducted in the emergency department (ED) reduces hospital length of stay in older patients admitted with common diagnoses.

METHODS

A non-randomised prospective pragmatic study in ED patients aged 65 and over diagnosed with one or more of six conditions (cerebrovascular insufficiency; fractured neck of femur; cardiac failure; myocardial ischaemia; exacerbation of chronic airways disease; respiratory tract infection). Intervention patients receiving comprehensive allied health assessment/intervention by at least one professional working in a care coordination team were compared with patients who underwent no assessment. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay measured in hours from commencement of inpatient bed occupancy to discharge or death. A zero truncated negative binomial regression model was used to analyse length of stay while adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

In 2121 patients and 1451 comparators, there was no difference in length of stay (median 88 vs 87 h) on unadjusted (log-rank p 0.28) or adjusted (IRR 0.97, p 0.32) analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Front loading allied health assessment in ED has no effect on hospital length of stay.

摘要

目的

辅助医疗干预可能在及时出院老年患者方面发挥重要作用。早期辅助医疗干预对住院时间的影响尚未量化。我们旨在确定在急诊科(ED)进行的早期辅助医疗干预是否会减少因常见诊断而住院的老年患者的住院时间。

方法

这是一项在 ED 中年龄在 65 岁及以上的患者中进行的非随机前瞻性实用研究,这些患者被诊断出患有六种疾病中的一种或多种(脑血管功能不全;股骨颈骨折;心力衰竭;心肌缺血;慢性气道疾病恶化;呼吸道感染)。干预组患者接受了由护理协调团队中至少一名专业人员进行的全面辅助健康评估/干预,而对照组患者则未进行评估。主要结局测量指标是从开始住院到出院或死亡的住院时间,以小时为单位。使用零截断负二项回归模型分析住院时间,同时调整协变量。

结果

在 2121 名患者和 1451 名对照者中,未调整(对数秩检验 p=0.28)或调整(IRR=0.97,p=0.32)分析的住院时间均无差异(中位数 88 小时对 87 小时)。

结论

ED 中的辅助医疗评估前置对住院时间没有影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验