Suppr超能文献

急诊科多学科团队的早期评估和干预对健康和社会保健的影响:系统评价。

Impact of early assessment and intervention by teams involving health and social care professionals in the emergency department: A systematic review.

机构信息

School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Health Research Institute, Ageing Research Cluster, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Emergency Department, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220709. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dedicated Health and Social Care Professional (HSCP) teams have been proposed for emergency departments (EDs) in an effort to improve patient and process outcomes. This systematic review synthesises the totality of evidence relating to the impact of early assessment and intervention by HSCP teams on quality, safety and effectiveness of care in the ED.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in April 2019 to identify experimental studies examining the effectiveness of ED-based HSCP teams providing services to adults aged ≥ 18 years old and including two or more of the following disciplines: occupational therapist, physiotherapist, medical social worker, clinical pharmacist, or speech and language therapist. Data extraction and quality appraisal of each study were conducted independently by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in the review (n = 273,886), all describing interdisciplinary Care Coordination Teams (CCTs) caring for adults aged ≥ 65 years old. CCT care was associated with on average 2% reduced rates of hospital admissions (three studies), improved referrals to community services for falls (one study), increased satisfaction (two studies) with the safety of discharge (patients and staff), and with the distribution of workload (staff), improved health-related quality of care (one study). No statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups emerged in terms of rates of ED re-visits, ranging between 0.2% and 3% (two studies); hospital length of stay (one hour difference noted in one study) or mortality rates (0.5% difference in one study). Increased rates of unplanned hospitalisations following the intervention (13.9% difference) were reported in one study. The methodological quality of the studies was mixed.

DISCUSSION

We found limited and heterogeneous evidence on the impact of HSCP teams in the ED, suggesting a reduction in hospital admissions as well as improved patient and staff satisfaction. More robust investigations including cost-effectiveness evaluations are needed.

摘要

背景

为了改善患者和流程结果,已提议在急诊科设立专门的医疗保健和社会护理专业人员(HSCP)团队。本系统评价综合了与 HSCP 团队在急诊科对质量、安全和护理效果的早期评估和干预相关的全部证据。

方法

我们于 2019 年 4 月进行了系统文献检索,以确定检查 ED 中基于 HSCP 团队为年龄≥18 岁的成年人提供服务的有效性的实验研究,包括以下两个或更多学科的专业人员:职业治疗师、物理治疗师、医疗社会工作者、临床药师或言语和语言治疗师。两位评审员独立进行了每项研究的数据提取和质量评估。

结果

本综述纳入了 6 项研究(n=273886),均描述了跨学科的护理协调团队(CCT)为年龄≥65 岁的成年人提供护理。CCT 护理与平均 2%的住院率降低相关(三项研究)、跌倒后转诊到社区服务的比例提高(一项研究)、患者和工作人员对出院安全的满意度提高(两项研究)以及工作量分配(工作人员)、改善健康相关护理质量(一项研究)。干预组和对照组之间在急诊科再就诊率(两项研究为 0.2%至 3%)、住院时间(一项研究相差一小时)或死亡率(一项研究相差 0.5%)方面没有出现统计学显著差异。一项研究报告称,干预后出现未计划住院的比例增加(相差 13.9%)。研究的方法学质量参差不齐。

讨论

我们发现关于急诊科 HSCP 团队的影响的证据有限且存在异质性,表明住院人数减少以及患者和工作人员满意度提高。需要进行更有力的调查,包括成本效益评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9dd/6668840/16b2b44320d2/pone.0220709.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验