Andrology Center, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Asian J Androl. 2013 Sep;15(5):658-61. doi: 10.1038/aja.2013.78. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcome of penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) in Chinese patients with severe erectile dysfunction (SED). From July 2000 to December 2011, 224 patients (mean age: 35.9±11.8 years, range: 20-75 years) with SED underwent PPI by experienced surgeon according to standard PPI procedure at our centre. A malleable prosthesis (AMS 650) was implanted in 45 cases (20.1%), and a three-piece inflatable prosthesis (AMS 700 CXM or AMS 700 CXR) was implanted in 179 cases (79.9%). Surgical outcomes, including postoperative complications, clinical efficacy and couple satisfaction, were evaluated over than 6 months postoperatively using medical record abstraction, IIEF-5, quality of life (QoL) scores, and the patient/partner sexual satisfaction score proposed by Bhojwani et al. Of the 224 patients eligible for the study, 201 subjects (89.7%) completed follow-up. All of patients could perform sexual intercourse post PPI with the mean postoperative IIEF-5 and QoL scores were 20.02±2.32 and 5.28±0.76, respectively, which were significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores (6.29±1.5 and 2.13±0.84, P<0.01). Of the 201 men, mechanical malfunction occurred in four cases (2.0%) and three cases were re-implanted new device, and two cases (1.0%) developed a mild curvature of the penis. Scrotal erosion with infection occurred in one case with diabetes mellitus (0.5%) and required complete removal of the implanted AMS 700 CXM. Satisfactory sexual intercourse at least twice per month was reported by 178 men (88.6%), and overall satisfaction with the PPI surgery was reported by 89.0% of men and 82.5% of partners. Patient satisfaction in the three-piece inflatable prosthesis group was higher than in the malleable prosthesis group (P<0.05). Satisfaction, however, between the types of prostheses, did not differ in the partner survey. PPI is a safe and effective treatment option for Chinese patients with SED and experienced surgeon perform PPI according to standard PPI procedure could reduce the postoperative complications of PPI and could improve patient satisfaction ratio and QoL.
我们回顾性评估了阴茎假体植入术(PPI)在患有严重勃起功能障碍(SED)的中国患者中的临床疗效。2000 年 7 月至 2011 年 12 月,我们中心的经验丰富的外科医生根据标准 PPI 程序为 224 例 SED 患者(平均年龄:35.9±11.8 岁,范围:20-75 岁)进行了 PPI。在 45 例(20.1%)患者中植入了可屈性假体(AMS 650),在 179 例(79.9%)患者中植入了三件式可膨胀假体(AMS 700 CXM 或 AMS 700 CXR)。通过病历摘录、IIEF-5、生活质量(QoL)评分和 Bhojwani 等人提出的患者/伴侣性满意度评分,术后 6 个月以上评估手术结果,包括术后并发症、临床疗效和夫妇满意度。在符合研究条件的 224 例患者中,有 201 例(89.7%)完成了随访。所有患者术后均可进行性交,术后平均 IIEF-5 和 QoL 评分分别为 20.02±2.32 和 5.28±0.76,与术前评分(6.29±1.5 和 2.13±0.84,P<0.01)相比均显著改善。在 201 名男性中,4 名(2.0%)出现机械故障,3 名重新植入新装置,2 名(1.0%)出现阴茎轻度弯曲。1 例合并糖尿病的患者发生阴囊侵蚀伴感染(0.5%),需要完全取出植入的 AMS 700 CXM。178 名男性(88.6%)报告至少每月进行两次满意的性交,89.0%的男性和 82.5%的伴侣对 PPI 手术表示满意。三件式可膨胀假体组的患者满意度高于可屈性假体组(P<0.05)。然而,在伴侣调查中,两种假体的满意度没有差异。PPI 是中国 SED 患者的一种安全有效的治疗选择,经验丰富的外科医生根据标准 PPI 程序进行 PPI 可以降低 PPI 的术后并发症,并可以提高患者满意度和 QoL。