• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗对视网膜静脉阻塞患者中心黄斑厚度的初始降低效果。

Comparing bevacizumab and ranibizumab for initial reduction of central macular thickness in patients with retinal vein occlusions.

作者信息

Singer Michael A, Cohen Steven R, Groth Sylvia L, Porbandarwalla Salman

机构信息

Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates (MCOA), San Antonio, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1377-83. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S46235. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S46235
PMID:23874079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3711954/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine short-term effects of ranibizumab versus bevacizumab on reduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) central macular thickness (CMT) in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusions (RVOs).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis in which patients with RVOs were injected with either bevacizumab or ranibizumab. At 2 weeks, all patients were injected with a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®). CMT on OCT and best-corrected visual acuity were obtained at baseline, at 2 weeks (just prior to the dexamethasone intravitreal implant), and 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients received injections (32 bevacizumab; 32 ranibizumab). At 2 weeks, bevacizumab group had a mean (±standard error of mean [SEM]) CMT reduction of 26.2% ± 3.4% versus 47% ± 3.5% reduction with ranibizumab (P < 0.0001). At 6 weeks, there was a 31.6% ± 3.2% CMT reduction with bevacizumab versus 52% ± 3.2% with ranibizumab (P < 0.0001). At 2 weeks, 15 (9%) of bevacizumab patients versus 25 (78.1%) ranibizumab patients achieved OCT CMT < 300 μm (P = 0.0192). At 6 weeks, 18 (56.3%) of bevacizumab compared to 30 (93.8%) of ranibizumab patients achieved CMT < 300 μm (P = 0.0010). Visual acuity was not significantly different at each time interval between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Ranibizumab appears to have a greater effect in the short-term of decreasing macular edema on OCT when compared to bevacizumab in patients with RVOs.

摘要

目的

研究雷珠单抗与贝伐单抗对视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)继发黄斑水肿患者光学相干断层扫描(OCT)中心黄斑厚度(CMT)降低的短期影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性分析,RVO患者接受了贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗注射。在2周时,所有患者均接受了地塞米松玻璃体内植入物(Ozurdex®)注射。在基线、2周(即将注射地塞米松玻璃体内植入物之前)和6周时获取OCT上的CMT和最佳矫正视力。

结果

64例患者接受了注射(32例接受贝伐单抗;32例接受雷珠单抗)。在2周时,贝伐单抗组CMT平均降低(±平均标准误差[SEM])26.2%±3.4%,而雷珠单抗组降低47%±3.5%(P<0.0001)。在6周时,贝伐单抗组CMT降低31.6%±3.2%,雷珠单抗组降低52%±3.2%(P<0.0001)。在2周时,15例(9%)接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者与25例(78.1%)接受雷珠单抗治疗的患者OCT CMT<300μm(P=0.0192)。在6周时,18例(56.3%)接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者与30例(93.8%)接受雷珠单抗治疗的患者CMT<300μm(P=0.0010)。两组在各时间间隔的视力无显著差异。

结论

与贝伐单抗相比,雷珠单抗在短期内对RVO患者OCT上黄斑水肿的减轻似乎有更大效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/1573a1ff0c47/opth-7-1377Fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/e6180f5aef14/opth-7-1377Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/cf0b31d87b44/opth-7-1377Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/5b8a34536860/opth-7-1377Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/57e21008b0bb/opth-7-1377Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/ba912c23396c/opth-7-1377Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/8ef425d13d03/opth-7-1377Fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/1573a1ff0c47/opth-7-1377Fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/e6180f5aef14/opth-7-1377Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/cf0b31d87b44/opth-7-1377Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/5b8a34536860/opth-7-1377Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/57e21008b0bb/opth-7-1377Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/ba912c23396c/opth-7-1377Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/8ef425d13d03/opth-7-1377Fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff59/3711954/1573a1ff0c47/opth-7-1377Fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing bevacizumab and ranibizumab for initial reduction of central macular thickness in patients with retinal vein occlusions.比较贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗对视网膜静脉阻塞患者中心黄斑厚度的初始降低效果。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1377-83. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S46235. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
2
Prospective study of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions in eyes not responsive to long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.前瞻性研究阿柏西普治疗对长期贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗无反应的视网膜静脉阻塞继发持续性黄斑水肿的疗效。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;48(1):53-60. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13636. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
Comparison of Intravitreal Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, and Dexamethasone Implant after Bevacizumab Failure in Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vascular Occlusions.玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗、阿柏西普和地塞米松植入物治疗视网膜血管阻塞继发黄斑水肿贝伐单抗治疗失败后的比较
Ophthalmologica. 2017;238(1-2):110-118. doi: 10.1159/000473864. Epub 2017 May 24.
4
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant versus anti-VEGF injection for treatment-naïve patients with retinal vein occlusion and macular edema: a 12-month follow-up study.玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入物与抗血管内皮生长因子注射治疗初治视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿患者的12个月随访研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;253(12):2095-102. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-2947-9. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
5
Ranibizumab versus Dexamethasone Implant in Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Two-year Outcomes.雷珠单抗与地塞米松植入物治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的两年疗效
Optom Vis Sci. 2018 Dec;95(12):1149-1154. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001306.
6
[Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions].贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013 Apr;230(4):405-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328373. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
7
Effect of combination therapy with bevacizumab and dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with retinal vein occlusion.贝伐单抗联合地塞米松眼内植入剂治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的效果。
Retina. 2012 Jul;32(7):1289-94. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318242b838.
8
Bevacizumab versus Dexamethasone Implant Followed by Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Macula Edema Associated with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.贝伐单抗与地塞米松植入剂继以贝伐单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞相关黄斑水肿的比较
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;32(1):29-37. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2016.0134. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
9
Combination of Intravitreal Corticosteroid with Anti-vegf in Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion.玻璃体内注射皮质类固醇与抗血管内皮生长因子联合治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2018 Spring;73(5-6):183-188.
10
Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion in a Chinese Population.玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入物与玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗中国人群视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的比较
Ophthalmic Res. 2017;58(1):8-14. doi: 10.1159/000458534. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety profiles of anti-VEGF drugs: bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept and ziv-aflibercept on human retinal pigment epithelium cells in culture.抗血管内皮生长因子药物的安全性:贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗、阿柏西普和泽必泰在培养的人视网膜色素上皮细胞中的安全性。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;98 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i11-16. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305302.
2
Comparison of bevacizumab and ranibizumab in age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.贝伐单抗与雷珠单抗治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):355-64. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.30. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results.雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性:两年结果。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jul;119(7):1388-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.053. Epub 2012 May 1.
2
Use of bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review.贝伐单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿的系统评价。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;250(6):787-93. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2016-6. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
3
Effect of combination therapy with bevacizumab and dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with retinal vein occlusion.
贝伐单抗联合地塞米松眼内植入剂治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的效果。
Retina. 2012 Jul;32(7):1289-94. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318242b838.
4
Pharmacokinetic rationale for dosing every 2 weeks versus 4 weeks with intravitreal ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept (vascular endothelial growth factor Trap-eye).玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗、贝伐单抗和阿柏西普(血管内皮生长因子 Trap-eye)每 2 周和 4 周给药的药代动力学原理。
Retina. 2012 Mar;32(3):434-57. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0B013E31822C290F.
5
Rapid resolution of macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion using ranibizumab after failure with multiple bevacizumab injections.在多次注射贝伐单抗治疗失败后,使用雷珠单抗使与视网膜中央静脉阻塞相关的黄斑水肿迅速消退。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;26(6):387-91. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2011.622339.
6
Ranibizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: six-month primary end point results of a phase III study.雷珠单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿:一项 III 期研究的 6 个月主要终点结果。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1102-1112.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.021. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
7
Ranibizumab for macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion: six-month primary end point results of a phase III study.雷珠单抗治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿:一项 III 期研究的 6 个月主要终点结果。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1124-1133.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.022. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
8
Aqueous humor levels of vasoactive molecules correlate with vitreous levels and macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion.血管活性分子的房水水平与视网膜中央静脉阻塞时的玻璃体水平及黄斑水肿相关。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar-Apr;20(2):402-9. doi: 10.1177/112067211002000222.
9
Anti-VEGF therapy: comparison of current and future agents.抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)疗法:当前与未来药物的比较
Eye (Lond). 2008 Oct;22(10):1330-6. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.88. Epub 2008 May 23.
10
The 15-year cumulative incidence of retinal vein occlusion: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.视网膜静脉阻塞的15年累积发病率:比弗迪姆眼研究
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;126(4):513-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.4.513.