School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 16;8(7):e67943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067943. Print 2013.
The frequency of visits to Emergency Departments (ED) varies greatly between populations. This may reflect variation in patient behaviour, need, accessibility, and service configuration as well as the complex interactions between these factors. This study investigates the relationship between distance, socio-economic deprivation, and proximity to an alternative care setting (a Minor Injuries Unit (MIU)), with particular attention to the interaction between distance and deprivation. It is set in a population of approximately 5.4 million living in central England, which is highly heterogeneous in terms of ethnicity, socio-economics, and distance to hospital. The study data set captured 1,413,363 ED visits made by residents of the region to National Health Service (NHS) hospitals during the financial year 2007/8. Our units of analysis were small units of census geography having an average population of 1,545. Separate regression models were made for children and adults. For each additional kilometre of distance from a hospital, predicted child attendances fell by 2.2% (1.7%-2.6% p<0.001) and predicted adult attendances fell by 1.5% (1.2% -1.8%, p<0.001). Compared to the least deprived quintile, attendances in the most deprived quintile more than doubled for children (incident rate ratio (IRR) = 2.19, (1.90-2.54, p<0.001)) and adults (IRR 2.26, (2.01-2.55, p<0.001)). Proximity of an MIU was significant and both adult and child attendances were greater in populations who lived further away from them, suggesting that MIUs may reduce ED demand. The interaction between distance and deprivation was significant. Attendance in deprived neighbourhoods reduces with distance to a greater degree than in less deprived ones for both adults and children. In conclusion, ED use is related to both deprivation and distance, but the effect of distance is modified by deprivation.
急诊科(ED)的就诊频率在不同人群中差异很大。这可能反映了患者行为、需求、可及性和服务配置的差异,以及这些因素之间的复杂相互作用。本研究调查了距离、社会经济剥夺程度和接近替代护理场所(轻伤单位(MIU))与 ED 使用之间的关系,特别关注距离和剥夺之间的相互作用。研究地点位于英格兰中部约 540 万人口的地区,该地区在族裔、社会经济和到医院的距离方面存在高度异质性。该研究数据集包括该地区居民在 2007/8 财政年度向国民保健制度(NHS)医院就诊的 1413363 次 ED 就诊。我们的分析单位是具有平均人口 1545 人的普查地理小单位。为儿童和成人分别建立了单独的回归模型。对于距离医院每增加一公里,预测儿童就诊人数下降 2.2%(1.7%-2.6%,p<0.001),预测成人就诊人数下降 1.5%(1.2%-1.8%,p<0.001)。与最不贫困的五分位数相比,最贫困五分位数的就诊人数增加了一倍以上,儿童就诊人数增加了 2.19 倍(发病率比(IRR)=2.19,(1.90-2.54,p<0.001))和成年人(IRR 2.26,(2.01-2.55,p<0.001))。MIU 的接近程度具有统计学意义,距离 MIU 较远的人群中,成人和儿童就诊人数都较多,这表明 MIU 可能会减少 ED 的需求。距离和贫困程度之间的相互作用具有统计学意义。对于成人和儿童来说,贫困社区的就诊率随着与距离的增加而降低的程度大于不贫困社区。总之,ED 的使用与贫困和距离有关,但距离的影响受到贫困程度的影响。