Suppr超能文献

N 回任务作为工作记忆测量的同时效度。

The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2010 May;18(4):394-412. doi: 10.1080/09658211003702171. Epub 2010 Apr 19.

Abstract

The N-back task is used extensively in literature as a working memory (WM) paradigm and it is increasingly used as a measure of individual differences. However, not much is known about the psychometric properties of this task and the current study aims to shed more light on this issue. We first review the current literature on the psychometric properties of the N-back task. With three experiments using task variants with different stimuli and load levels, we then investigate the nature of the N-back task by investigating its relationship to WM, and its role as an inter-individual difference measure. Consistent with previous literature, our data suggest that the N-back task is not a useful measure of individual differences in WM, partly because of its insufficient reliability. Nevertheless, the task seems to be useful for experimental research in WM and also well predicts inter-individual differences in other higher cognitive functions, such as fluid intelligence, especially when used at higher levels of load.

摘要

N-back 任务在文献中被广泛用作工作记忆 (WM) 范式,并且越来越多地被用作个体差异的衡量标准。然而,对于该任务的心理测量学特性知之甚少,本研究旨在对此问题进行更深入的研究。我们首先回顾了 N-back 任务心理测量学特性的现有文献。然后,我们通过使用具有不同刺激和负载水平的任务变体进行三个实验,通过研究其与 WM 的关系以及作为个体差异衡量标准的作用,来探讨 N-back 任务的本质。与先前的文献一致,我们的数据表明,N-back 任务不是 WM 个体差异的有效衡量标准,部分原因是其可靠性不足。然而,该任务似乎对于 WM 的实验研究很有用,并且很好地预测了其他更高认知功能(如流体智力)的个体差异,尤其是在更高负载水平下使用时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验