Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Jul 11;7(7):e2310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002310. Print 2013.
This qualitative study aimed to provide an in-depth understanding of the meaning of dengue fever (DF) amongst people living in a dengue endemic region, dengue prevention and treatment-seeking behaviours. The Health Belief Model was used as a framework to explore and understand dengue prevention behaviours.
A total of 14 focus group discussions were conducted with 84 Malaysian citizens of different socio-demographic backgrounds between 16(th) December, 2011 and 12(th) May, 2012.
The study revealed that awareness about DF and prevention measures were high. The pathophysiology of dengue especially dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS) were rarely known; as a result, it was seen as deadly by some but was also perceived as easily curable by others without a basis of understanding. Young adults and elderly participants had a low perception of susceptibility to DF. In general, the low perceived susceptibility emerged as two themes, namely a perceived natural ability to withstand infection and a low risk of being in contact with the dengue virus vector, Aedes spp. mosquitoes. The barriers to sustained self-prevention against dengue prevention that emerged in focus groups were: i) lack of self-efficacy, ii) lack of perceived benefit, iii) low perceived susceptibility, and iv) unsure perceived susceptibility. Low perceived benefit of continued dengue prevention practices was a result of lack of concerted action against dengue in their neighborhood. Traditional medical practices and home remedies were widely perceived and experienced as efficacious in treating DF.
Behavioural change towards attaining sustainability in dengue preventive practices may be enhanced by fostering comprehensive knowledge of dengue and a change in health beliefs. Wide use of unconventional therapy for DF warrants the need to enlighten the public to limit their reliance on unproven alternative treatments.
本定性研究旨在深入了解在登革热流行地区居住的人们对登革热(DF)的认知、登革热的预防和治疗寻医行为。该研究采用健康信念模型作为框架,探索和理解登革热预防行为。
2011 年 12 月 16 日至 2012 年 5 月 12 日期间,对来自马来西亚不同社会人口背景的 84 名公民进行了 14 次焦点小组讨论。
研究表明,对 DF 和预防措施的认识程度较高。人们对登革热的病理生理学,特别是登革出血热(DHF)和登革休克综合征(DSS)知之甚少;因此,一些人认为它是致命的,但也有人认为它是可以轻易治愈的,而没有基于理解的依据。年轻成年人和老年人对 DF 的易感性认知较低。总的来说,低感知易感性出现了两个主题,即感知自身具有抵御感染的自然能力和接触登革热病毒载体白纹伊蚊的风险较低。在焦点小组中出现的持续自我预防登革热的障碍是:i)缺乏自我效能,ii)缺乏感知益处,iii)感知易感性低,iv)不确定的感知易感性。持续预防登革热行为缺乏感知益处,是因为他们的邻里缺乏对登革热的一致行动。传统的医疗实践和家庭疗法被广泛认为对治疗 DF 是有效的。
通过增强对登革热的全面认识和改变健康信念,可能会促进实现登革热预防行为的可持续性改变。广泛使用非常规疗法治疗 DF,需要提醒公众限制对未经证实的替代疗法的依赖。