Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Freshwater & Stress Ecology, Späthstraße 80/81, 12437 Berlin, Germany.
Chemosphere. 2013 Oct;93(6):1005-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.069. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
Hormetic lifespan extension is, for obvious reasons, beneficial to an individual. But is this effect really cost-neutral? To answer this question, four tannic polyphenols were tested on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. All were able to extend the lifespan, but only some in a hormetic fashion. Additional life trait variables including stress resistance, reproductive behavior, growth, and physical fitness were observed during the exposure to the most life extending concentrations. These traits represent the quality of life and the population fitness, being the most important parameters of a hormetic treatment besides lifespan. Indeed, it emerged that each life-extension is accompanied by a constraining effect in at least one other endpoint, for example growth, mobility, stress resistance, or reproduction. Thus, in this context, longevity could not be considered to be attained for free and therefore it is likely that other hormetic benefits may also incur cost-intensive and unpredictable side-effects.
由于显而易见的原因,胁迫延长寿命对个体是有益的。但这种效应真的没有成本吗?为了回答这个问题,我们用四种单宁多酚处理秀丽隐杆线虫。所有这些多酚都能延长寿命,但只有部分以胁迫的方式延长寿命。在接触最能延长寿命的浓度时,还观察到了其他与寿命相关的生存特征变量,包括应激抗性、生殖行为、生长和身体健康。这些特征代表了生活质量和种群适应性,是胁迫处理除了寿命之外最重要的参数。事实上,结果表明,每种寿命的延长都伴随着至少一个其他终点的限制效应,例如生长、运动能力、应激抗性或生殖能力。因此,在这种情况下,不能认为长寿是免费获得的,因此,其他胁迫可能也会产生成本高且不可预测的副作用。