Suppr超能文献

单次电击除颤在成人心搏骤停中的成功:系统评价。

Single-shock defibrillation success in adult cardiac arrest: a systematic review.

机构信息

Rescu, Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84(11):1480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Current resuscitation guidelines advise a single biphasic shock followed by chest compressions; however, it is unclear if this applies to all waveforms and energy levels. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the comparative success rates for single-shock defibrillation across waveforms evaluated in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, dissertation abstract databases, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Two investigators independently reviewed titles, abstracts and full texts in a hierarchical manner for study eligibility with a quadratic kappa score at each level. Two authors abstracted data independently and the quality of the articles was assessed using the five-point Jadad scale. Outcomes were termination of ventricular fibrillation (VF)/ventricular tachycardia (VT) at 5s post shock (TOF), return of organized rhythm (ROOR) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

RESULTS

A total of 3281 potentially relevant citations were identified and, of these, eight papers were selected with Kappa values of 0.53 for titles, 0.71 for abstracts, and 0.94 for articles. Quality scores varied from 0 to 4/5. Biphasic first-shock success for all three outcomes of interest was similar regardless of energy levels, and uniformly superior to monophasic first-shock success. Median time to first shock varied across trials based on level of randomization (first responders versus advanced life support tiered response) and may contribute to observed differences. Lack of variability across two waveforms precluded a meta-analytical approach.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests that evaluated biphasic waveforms have similar first-shock success as measured by the three outcomes of interest and all are superior to monophasic shocks.

摘要

目的

目前的复苏指南建议进行单次双相电击,随后进行胸外按压;然而,尚不清楚这是否适用于所有波形和能量水平。我们对文献进行了系统回顾,以确定在院外心脏骤停患者中评估的各种波形单次电击除颤的成功率。

方法

检索了 EMBASE、MEDLINE、EBM Reviews、学位论文摘要数据库和 clinicaltrials.gov。两名研究人员独立地按照层次结构对标题、摘要和全文进行审查,以确定研究的适用性,并在每个层次上使用二次 kappa 评分。两名作者独立提取数据,并使用五分制 Jadad 量表评估文章的质量。结果是电击后 5 秒终止室颤(VF)/室性心动过速(VT)(TOF)、恢复有组织的节律(ROOR)和自主循环恢复(ROSC)。

结果

共确定了 3281 篇潜在相关的引用文献,其中 8 篇文献被选中,其标题的 Kappa 值为 0.53,摘要为 0.71,文章为 0.94。质量评分从 0 到 4/5 不等。无论能量水平如何,所有三种感兴趣的结果的双相首次电击成功率均相似,且均优于单相首次电击成功率。首次电击的中位时间因随机化水平(第一反应者与高级生命支持分层反应)而在各试验中有所不同,这可能导致了观察到的差异。由于两种波形之间缺乏可变性,因此无法进行荟萃分析。

结论

这项系统回顾表明,评估的双相波形在三种感兴趣的结果方面具有相似的首次电击成功率,并且均优于单相电击。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验