University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Aug;25(3):699-712. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000114.
The biological sensitivity to context hypothesis posits that high physiological reactivity (i.e., increases in arousal from baseline) constitutes heightened sensitivity to environmental influences, for better or worse. To test this hypothesis, we examined the interactive effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity to a public speaking task on aggressive/rule-breaking and prosocial behavior in a large sample of adolescents (N = 679; M age = 16.14). Multivariate analyses revealed small- to medium-sized main effects of lower family cohesion and lower heart rate reactivity on higher levels of aggressive/rule-breaking and lower levels of prosocial behavior. Although there was some evidence of three-way interactions among family cohesion, heart rate reactivity, and sex in predicting these outcome variables, these interactions were not in the direction predicted by the biological sensitivity to context hypothesis. Instead, heightened reactivity appeared to operate as a protective factor against family adversity, rather than as a susceptibility factor. The results of the present study raise the possibility that stress reactivity may no longer operate as a mechanism of differential susceptibility in adolescence.
生物对环境敏感假说认为,较高的生理反应性(即从基线增加的唤醒程度)构成了对环境影响的更高敏感性,无论好坏。为了检验这一假说,我们在一个大型青少年样本(N=679;平均年龄=16.14 岁)中,考察了家庭凝聚力和心率对公开演讲任务的反应性与攻击/违规行为和亲社会行为之间的交互作用。多元分析显示,家庭凝聚力较低和心率反应性较低与较高水平的攻击/违规行为和较低水平的亲社会行为呈中等至小等强度的主效应。尽管有证据表明家庭凝聚力、心率反应性和性别在预测这些结果变量方面存在三向交互作用,但这些交互作用并不符合生物对环境敏感假说的预测方向。相反,反应性增强似乎是对家庭逆境的一种保护因素,而不是易感性因素。本研究的结果提出了一种可能性,即应激反应性可能不再是青少年差异易感性的一种机制。