Khirani Sonia, Ramirez Adriana, Aloui Sabrina, Leboulanger Nicolas, Picard Arnaud, Fauroux Brigitte
Crit Care. 2013 Jul 26;17(4):R167. doi: 10.1186/cc12846.
Noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is recognized as an effective treatment for severe airway obstruction in young children. The aim of the present study was to compare a clinical setting with a physiological setting of noninvasive CPAP in infants with nocturnal alveolar hypoventilation due to severe upper airway obstruction (UAO) or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).
The breathing pattern and respiratory muscle output of all consecutive infants due to start CPAP in our noninvasive ventilation unit were retrospectively analysed. CPAP set on clinical noninvasive parameters (clinical CPAP) was compared to CPAP set on the normalization or the maximal reduction of the oesophageal pressure (Poes) and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) swings (physiological CPAP). Expiratory gastric pressure (Pgas) swing was measured.
The data of 12 infants (mean age 10 ± 8 mo) with UAO (n = 7) or BPD (n = 5) were gathered. The mean clinical CPAP (8 ± 2 cmH₂O) was associated with a significant decrease in Poes and Pdi swings. Indeed, Poes swing decreased from 31 ± 15 cmH₂O during spontaneous breathing to 21 ± 10 cmH₂O during CPAP (P < 0.05). The mean physiological CPAP level was 2 ± 2 cmH2₂O higher than the mean clinical CPAP level and was associated with a significantly greater improvement in all indices of respiratory effort (Poes swing 11 ± 5 cm H₂O; P < 0.05 compared to clinical CPAP). Expiratory abdominal activity was present during the clinical CPAP and decreased during physiological CPAP.
A physiological setting of noninvasive CPAP, based on the recording of Poes and Pgas, is superior to a clinical setting, based on clinical noninvasive parameters. Expiratory abdominal activity was present during spontaneous breathing and decreased in the physiological CPAP setting.
无创持续气道正压通气(CPAP)被认为是治疗幼儿严重气道阻塞的有效方法。本研究的目的是比较在因严重上气道阻塞(UAO)或支气管肺发育不良(BPD)导致夜间肺泡通气不足的婴儿中,无创CPAP的临床设置与生理设置。
回顾性分析了我们无创通气单元中所有即将开始使用CPAP的连续婴儿的呼吸模式和呼吸肌输出。将基于临床无创参数设置的CPAP(临床CPAP)与基于食管压力(Poes)和跨膈压(Pdi)波动的正常化或最大降低设置的CPAP(生理CPAP)进行比较。测量呼气时胃内压力(Pgas)波动。
收集了12例因UAO(n = 7)或BPD(n = 5)的婴儿(平均年龄10±8个月)的数据。平均临床CPAP(8±2 cmH₂O)与Poes和Pdi波动的显著降低相关。事实上,Poes波动从自主呼吸时的31±15 cmH₂O降至CPAP时的21±10 cmH₂O(P < 0.05)。平均生理CPAP水平比平均临床CPAP水平高2±2 cmH₂O,并且与呼吸努力的所有指标的显著更大改善相关(Poes波动11±5 cmH₂O;与临床CPAP相比,P < 0.05)。临床CPAP期间存在呼气时腹部活动,而生理CPAP期间减少。
基于Poes和Pgas记录的无创CPAP生理设置优于基于临床无创参数的临床设置。呼气时腹部活动在自主呼吸时存在,在生理CPAP设置中减少。