Ziegenhorn J, Senn M, Bücher T
Clin Chem. 1976 Feb;22(2):151-60.
Re-investigating the accuracy of the commonly used values for molar absorptivities (epsilon) of beta-NADH and beta-NADPH at Hg 334, Hg 365, or 340 nm, we obtained the following results: The maximum of absorbance of NADH is shifted from about 340 nm at 0 degrees C to about 338.5 nm at 38 degrees C; the corresponding maxima of NADPH are located at about 0.5-nm longer wavelengths. In addition, the absorption curves of both coenzymes broaden with increasing temperature. For these reasons, the epsilon-values of NADH and NADPH are generally different from each other, and are temperature-dependent. Only at 334 nm are they almost identical and nearly independent of temperature. Therefore this wavelength is recommended for precise measurements. The epsilon-values of these coenzymes are influenced by ionic strength and pH. To determine the absolute values of the molar absorptivities, we performed the glutamate dehydrogenase or lactate dehydrogenase assay with carefully purified 2-oxoglutaric acid or pyruvic acid in the presence of excess coenzyme. The purity of the substrates was checked through differential scanning calorimetry, moisture analysis, gas-liquid chromatography, gas chromatography in combination with mass spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The epsilon-values observed under the various conditions are about 1-7% higher than those currently used.
重新研究β-NADH和β-NADPH在汞灯334nm、365nm或340nm处摩尔吸光系数(ε)常用值的准确性后,我们得到以下结果:NADH的吸光度最大值从0℃时的约340nm移至38℃时的约338.5nm;NADPH的相应最大值位于波长约长0.5nm处。此外,两种辅酶的吸收曲线都随温度升高而变宽。由于这些原因,NADH和NADPH的ε值通常彼此不同,且与温度有关。仅在334nm处它们几乎相同且几乎与温度无关。因此,推荐使用该波长进行精确测量。这些辅酶的ε值受离子强度和pH的影响。为了确定摩尔吸光系数的绝对值,我们在过量辅酶存在下,用经过仔细纯化的2-氧代戊二酸或丙酮酸进行谷氨酸脱氢酶或乳酸脱氢酶测定。通过差示扫描量热法、水分分析、气液色谱法、气相色谱-质谱联用以及核磁共振光谱法检查底物的纯度。在各种条件下观察到的ε值比目前使用的值高约1-7%。