Katsoulis Joannis, Mericske-Stern Regina, Yates Douglas M, Izutani Naomi, Enkling Norbert, Blatz Markus B
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dent Mater. 2013 Sep;29(9):945-53. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
Optical scanners combined with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology provide high accuracy in the fabrication of titanium (TIT) and zirconium dioxide (ZrO) bars. The aim of this study was to compare the precision of fit of CAD/CAM TIT bars produced with a photogrammetric and a laser scanner.
Twenty rigid CAD/CAM bars were fabricated on one single edentulous master cast with 6 implants in the positions of the second premolars, canines and central incisors. A photogrammetric scanner (P) provided digitized data for TIT-P (n=5) while a laser scanner (L) was used for TIT-L (n=5). The control groups consisted of soldered gold bars (gold, n=5) and ZrO-P with similar bar design. Median vertical distance between implant and bar platforms from non-tightened implants (one-screw test) was calculated from mesial, buccal and distal scanning electron microscope measurements.
Vertical microgaps were not significantly different between TIT-P (median 16μm; 95% CI 10-27μm) and TIT-L (25μm; 13-32μm). Gold (49μm; 12-69μm) had higher values than TIT-P (p=0.001) and TIT-L (p=0.008), while ZrO-P (35μm; 17-55μm) exhibited higher values than TIT-P (p=0.023). Misfit values increased in all groups from implant position 23 (3 units) to 15 (10 units), while in gold and TIT-P values decreased from implant 11 toward the most distal implant 15.
CAD/CAM titanium bars showed high precision of fit using photogrammetric and laser scanners. In comparison, the misfit of ZrO bars (CAM/CAM, photogrammetric scanner) and soldered gold bars was statistically higher but values were clinically acceptable.
光学扫描仪与计算机辅助设计及计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)技术相结合,在钛(TIT)和二氧化锆(ZrO)棒材制造中具有高精度。本研究的目的是比较使用摄影测量扫描仪和激光扫描仪制作的CAD/CAM TIT棒材的贴合精度。
在一个单颌无牙主模型上制作20根刚性CAD/CAM棒材,第二前磨牙、尖牙和中切牙位置植入6颗种植体。摄影测量扫描仪(P)为TIT-P(n = 5)提供数字化数据,而激光扫描仪(L)用于TIT-L(n = 5)。对照组由焊接金条(金,n = 5)和具有相似棒材设计的ZrO-P组成。通过近中、颊侧和远中扫描电子显微镜测量,计算未拧紧种植体(单螺钉测试)的种植体与棒材平台之间的垂直距离中位数。
TIT-P(中位数16μm;95%可信区间10 - 27μm)和TIT-L(25μm;13 - 32μm)之间的垂直微间隙无显著差异。金(49μm;12 - 69μm)的值高于TIT-P(p = 0.001)和TIT-L(p = 0.008),而ZrO-P(35μm;17 - 55μm)的值高于TIT-P(p = 0.023)。所有组的不贴合值从种植体位置23(3个单位)到15(10个单位)增加,而在金组和TIT-P组中,值从种植体11向最远端种植体15降低。
使用摄影测量扫描仪和激光扫描仪制作的CAD/CAM钛棒材显示出高贴合精度。相比之下,ZrO棒材(CAM/CAM,摄影测量扫描仪)和焊接金条的不贴合在统计学上更高,但这些值在临床上是可接受的。