Borrelli Sara Elisabetta
The University of Nottingham, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Physiotherapy, Queen's Medical Centre - Medical School, Nottingham B33 - NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
Midwifery. 2014 Jan;30(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
to review the literature around what is considered to be a good midwife and in particular what women value in a midwife, in order to identify the gaps in the evidence for future research.
this paper reviews the research in the area of interest over the past 30 years. The literature search focused on the concept of good midwife using synonyms and antonyms. The inclusion criteria included language (English or Italian). The examined databases were Medline, Maternity and Infant Care, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstract and CINAHL.
studies conducted in high-income countries were taken into account. A focused review of papers which explicitly investigated what a good midwife means and a thematic analysis on what women value in a midwife were carried out.
different standpoints have been considered (midwives, student midwives, women and their partners), focusing in particular on women viewpoint.
the literature review reveals information about what is considered to be a good midwife from a range of perspectives and what women value in a midwife. A good midwife should possess several attributes: theoretical knowledge, professional competencies, personal qualities, communication skills and moral/ethical values. According to the thematic analysis around what childbearing women value in a midwife, frequent key-themes emerging from the literature were: support, possibility of choice, feeling in control and having appropriate information.
the meaning of good midwife might change according to different actors involved in midwifery care and there is no agreement on the definition of what constitutes a good midwife. Furthermore, it is not clear if what women value in a good midwife corresponds to the midwives' perception of themselves as good professionals. There is a dearth of information around women's expectations and experiences specifically of a good midwife, and even less around whether this changes according to where they give birth.
this literature review seeks to stimulate debate and reflection among midwives and professionals involved in the childbearing event, in order to fulfil women's expectations of their midwife and increase their satisfaction with the birth experience. The identification of the gaps in the evidence provided the starting point and allowed the development of research questions and methodology for an ongoing doctoral research. On the basis of the gaps in the evidence, the doctoral research will explore and seek to explain nulliparous women's expectations and experiences of a good midwife in the context of different planned place of birth, using a Grounded Theory methodology. It is also expected that the findings of this literature review will stimulate additional research in this area to ultimately inform midwifery practice and midwifery educational programmes.
回顾关于被认为是优秀助产士的相关文献,特别是女性对助产士的看重之处,以找出证据中的差距,为未来研究提供方向。
本文回顾了过去30年该领域的研究。文献检索聚焦于使用同义词和反义词来查找优秀助产士的概念。纳入标准包括语言(英语或意大利语)。所检索的数据库有医学索引数据库(Medline)、母婴护理数据库、应用社会科学索引与摘要数据库以及护理及健康领域数据库(CINAHL)。
纳入了在高收入国家开展的研究。对明确探究优秀助产士含义的论文进行了重点综述,并对女性看重助产士哪些方面进行了主题分析。
考虑了不同的立场(助产士、助产专业学生、女性及其伴侣),尤其着重于女性的观点。
文献综述揭示了从一系列角度来看被认为是优秀助产士的相关信息,以及女性看重助产士的哪些方面。一名优秀的助产士应具备多种特质:理论知识、专业能力、个人品质、沟通技巧以及道德/伦理价值观。根据对分娩女性看重助产士哪些方面的主题分析,文献中频繁出现的关键主题有:支持、选择的可能性、掌控感以及获得适当的信息。
优秀助产士的含义可能因参与助产护理的不同角色而有所变化,对于优秀助产士的构成定义尚无定论。此外,尚不清楚女性看重的优秀助产士特质是否与助产士对自身作为优秀专业人员的认知相符。关于女性对优秀助产士的期望和经历,尤其是这种期望和经历是否因分娩地点而异,相关信息匮乏。
本综述旨在激发助产士及参与分娩相关事务的专业人员之间的讨论与反思,以满足女性对助产士的期望,提高她们对分娩体验的满意度。找出证据中的差距为正在进行的博士研究提供了出发点,并有助于确定研究问题和方法。基于证据中的差距,博士研究将采用扎根理论方法,探索并试图解释初产妇在不同计划分娩地点背景下对优秀助产士的期望和经历。预计本综述的结果还将激发该领域的更多研究,最终为助产实践和助产教育项目提供参考。