Animal Welfare Science Centre, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
J Anim Sci. 2013 Oct;91(10):4953-64. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5807. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
A total of 3,120 sows, in 4 time replicates, were used to determine the effects of group size and floor space on sow welfare using behavioral, physiological, health, and fitness variables. Within 1 to 7 d postinsemination, sows were assigned randomly to treatments of a 3 by 6 factorial arrangement, with 3 group sizes (10, 30, or 80 sows/pen) and 6 floor space allowances (1.4, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, or 3.0 m(2)/sow). Sows were housed on partially slatted concrete floors, and overhead feeders delivered 4 times/day to provide a total of 2.5 kg of feed/sow. As pen space increased from 1.4 to 3.0 m(2)/sow, aggression at feeding decreased from about 9 to 7 bouts/sow (linear, P = 0.029) and plasma cortisol concentrations decreased from about 28 to 21 ng/mL (linear, P = 0.0089) at 2 d. Although the results are in accord with a linear decline from 1.4 to 3 m(2)/sow, the results are also in accord with a decline in these measurements from 1.4 to 1.8 m(2)/sow and no further decline greater than 1.8 m(2)/sow. Farrowing rate (percentage of inseminated sows that farrowed) also increased from about 60 to 75% as space increased from 1.4 to 3.0 m(2)/sow (linear, P = 0.012). Group size was related to skin injuries on d 9 (P = 0.0017), 23 (P = 0.0046), and 51 (P = 0.0006), with groups of 10 consistently having the lowest number of total injuries over this period. Based on the aggression and cortisol results, it is credible to judge that, within the range of floor space allowances studied, sow welfare improves with increased space. However, from a sow welfare perspective, the experiment had insufficient precision to determine what is an adequate space allowance for sows. Thus, although the results definitely support a space allowance of 1.4 m(2)/sow being too small, it is not possible to give guidance on an actual space allowance at mixing that is adequate.
共有 3120 头母猪,在 4 个时间重复中,被用于通过行为、生理、健康和适应力变量来确定群体规模和占地面积对母猪福利的影响。在配种后 1 至 7 天内,母猪被随机分配到 3x6 析因处理的处理中,群体规模为 3(每组 10、30 或 80 头母猪/圈),占地面积允许量为 6(1.4、1.8、2.0、2.2、2.4 或 3.0m2/头母猪)。母猪被饲养在部分有缝隙的混凝土地板上,顶棚式饲料器每天投喂 4 次,以向每头母猪提供 2.5 公斤饲料。随着圈舍面积从 1.4 平方米/头增加到 3.0 平方米/头,采食时的攻击行为从每头母猪约 9 次减少到 7 次(线性,P=0.029),血浆皮质醇浓度从约 28 减少到 21ng/ml(线性,P=0.0089),2 天。尽管结果与从 1.4 平方米到 3 平方米的线性下降一致,但结果也与从 1.4 平方米到 1.8 平方米的这些测量值的下降一致,而且在 1.8 平方米之后,没有进一步的下降超过 1.8 平方米/头。窝产仔率(经配种的母猪产仔的百分比)也从约 60%增加到 75%,随着面积从 1.4 平方米增加到 3.0 平方米(线性,P=0.012)。群体规模与第 9 天(P=0.0017)、第 23 天(P=0.0046)和第 51 天(P=0.0006)的皮肤损伤有关,在这段时间内,10 头母猪的总损伤数量始终最低。根据攻击和皮质醇的结果,可以合理地判断,在研究的占地面积允许范围内,随着空间的增加,母猪福利得到改善。然而,从母猪福利的角度来看,该实验的精度不足以确定母猪的适宜占地面积。因此,尽管结果肯定支持 1.4m2/头母猪的占地面积太小,但不可能就混合饲养的适当占地面积提供指导。