Suppr超能文献

气味偏好影响大鼠的辨别学习。

Odor preferences shape discrimination learning in rats.

作者信息

Devore Sasha, Lee Joshua, Linster Christiane

机构信息

Computational Physiology Laboratory, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

Behav Neurosci. 2013 Aug;127(4):498-504. doi: 10.1037/a0033329.

Abstract

Forced-choice discrimination is a standard behavioral paradigm used to test animals' abilities in learning and memory. In this type of task, a reward association is made between a sensory stimulus and a food or water reward and the frequency of correct choice for the stimulus associated with the reward is measured. We show here that when olfactory sensory stimuli are used, spontaneous preferences for odors can influence speed of acquisition in a forced-choice discrimination task. We first show that among a battery of 53 odorants, some odorants elicit longer bouts of spontaneous investigation than others. By measuring relative spontaneous investigation times for pairs of simultaneously presented odorants, we confirm that these odor preferences are robust and reliable. Finally, we show that performance on a forced-choice olfactory discrimination task depends on relative spontaneous preferences between the rewarded and unrewarded odorants. Namely, rats acquire novel forced-choice odor discrimination problems significantly faster if the preferred odorant, as assessed by relative spontaneous investigation time, is associated with the reward. These results indicate that even subtle differences in the tendency for an animal to approach and investigate one odorant over another can lead to substantial biases in basic learning and memory tasks.

摘要

强迫选择辨别是一种用于测试动物学习和记忆能力的标准行为范式。在这类任务中,在一种感觉刺激与食物或水奖励之间建立奖励关联,并测量与奖励相关联的刺激的正确选择频率。我们在此表明,当使用嗅觉感觉刺激时,对气味的自发偏好会影响强迫选择辨别任务中的习得速度。我们首先表明,在53种气味剂中,一些气味剂引发的自发探究时间比其他气味剂更长。通过测量同时呈现的气味剂对的相对自发探究时间,我们证实这些气味偏好是强烈且可靠的。最后,我们表明强迫选择嗅觉辨别任务的表现取决于奖励气味剂和未奖励气味剂之间的相对自发偏好。也就是说,如果根据相对自发探究时间评估,偏好的气味剂与奖励相关联,大鼠会显著更快地习得新的强迫选择气味辨别问题。这些结果表明,即使动物接近和探究一种气味剂而非另一种气味剂的倾向存在细微差异,也会导致基本学习和记忆任务中出现实质性偏差。

相似文献

1
Odor preferences shape discrimination learning in rats.
Behav Neurosci. 2013 Aug;127(4):498-504. doi: 10.1037/a0033329.
2
Odor-reward learning and enrichment have similar effects on odor perception.
Physiol Behav. 2008 Jul 5;94(4):621-6. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
3
Successful acquisition of an olfactory discrimination paradigm by South African fur seals, Arctocephalus pusillus.
Physiol Behav. 2008 Mar 18;93(4-5):1033-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.01.019. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
4
Olfactory Discrimination Learning in an Outbred and an Inbred Strain of Mice.
Chem Senses. 2015 Sep;40(7):489-96. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjv032. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
Why sniff fast? The relationship between sniff frequency, odor discrimination, and receptor neuron activation in the rat.
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):1089-102. doi: 10.1152/jn.90981.2008. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
6
Significance of sniffing pattern during the acquisition of an olfactory discrimination task.
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Oct 1;312:341-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.06.039. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
7
Basal forebrain dynamics during nonassociative and associative olfactory learning.
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 1;115(1):423-33. doi: 10.1152/jn.00572.2015. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
10
Inter- and intra-mouse variability in odor preferences revealed in an olfactory multiple-choice test.
Behav Neurosci. 2018 Apr;132(2):88-98. doi: 10.1037/bne0000233. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Second-order threat conditioning in the amygdala-posterior piriform cortex network.
Commun Biol. 2025 Jun 2;8(1):846. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08287-2.
2
Mapping functional traces of opioid memories in the rat brain.
Brain Commun. 2024 Aug 19;6(5):fcae281. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae281. eCollection 2024.
4
The ventral hippocampus is activated in olfactory but not auditory threat memory.
Front Neural Circuits. 2024 Feb 27;18:1371130. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2024.1371130. eCollection 2024.
6
Olfactory threat extinction in the piriform cortex: An age-dependent employment of NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 31;120(44):e2309986120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309986120. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
7
A stable, distributed code for cue value in mouse cortex during reward learning.
Elife. 2023 Jun 30;12:RP84604. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84604.
8
Image discrimination reversal learning is impaired by sleep deprivation in rats: Cognitive rigidity or fatigue?
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Nov 17;16:1052441. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.1052441. eCollection 2022.
9
Locus Coeruleus Activation Patterns Differentially Modulate Odor Discrimination Learning and Odor Valence in Rats.
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2021 Apr 5;2(2):tgab026. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab026. eCollection 2021.
10
Shared Pheromonal Communication of Specific Fear Between Adult Sprague Dawley Rats.
Bio Protoc. 2020 Mar 20;10(6):e3564. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3564.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral consequences of innate preferences and olfactory learning in hawkmoth-flower interactions.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 4;105(9):3404-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709811105. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
2
Adrenergic modulation of olfactory bulb circuitry affects odor discrimination.
Learn Mem. 2007 Aug 3;14(8):539-47. doi: 10.1101/lm.606407. Print 2007 Aug.
3
Olfactory bulb gamma oscillations are enhanced with task demands.
J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 1;27(31):8358-65. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1199-07.2007.
4
Cholinergic modulation in the olfactory bulb influences spontaneous olfactory discrimination in adult rats.
Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Dec;24(11):3234-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05212.x.
5
Dopamine D(2) receptor activation modulates perceived odor intensity.
Behav Neurosci. 2006 Apr;120(2):393-400. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.2.393.
6
Behavioral changes induced in rats by exposure to trimethylthiazoline, a component of fox odor.
Behav Neurosci. 2005 Aug;119(4):1004-10. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.4.1004.
7
Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat.
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Nov;6(11):1224-9. doi: 10.1038/nn1142. Epub 2003 Oct 19.
8
Behavioral models of odor similarity.
Behav Neurosci. 2002 Apr;116(2):222-31. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.116.2.222.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验