• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reinforcement probability modulates temporal memory selection and integration processes.强化概率调节时间记忆的选择和整合过程。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
2
Stimulus compounding in interval timing: the modality-duration relationship of the anchor durations results in qualitatively different response patterns to the compound cue.间隔计时中的刺激复合:锚定持续时间的模态-持续时间关系导致对复合线索产生质的不同的反应模式。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jan;37(1):94-107. doi: 10.1037/a0020200.
3
Temporal averaging across multiple response options: insight into the mechanisms underlying integration.跨多个反应选项的时间平均:深入了解整合背后的机制。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Mar;19(2):329-42. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0935-4. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
4
Averaging of temporal memories by rats.大鼠对时间记忆的平均化。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jul;35(3):434-9. doi: 10.1037/a0014021.
5
Timing in a variable interval procedure: evidence for a memory singularity.可变间隔程序中的时间安排:记忆奇点的证据。
Behav Processes. 2014 Jan;101:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
6
Avoidance learning facilitates temporal processing in the primary auditory cortex.回避学习有助于初级听觉皮层的时间处理。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2008 Sep;90(2):347-57. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
7
Temporal memory averaging and post-encoding alterations in temporal expectation.时间记忆平均化与时间预期中的编码后改变。
Behav Processes. 2013 May;95:31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
8
Interstimulus interval as a discriminative stimulus: evidence of the generality of a novel asymmetry in temporal discrimination learning.作为辨别性刺激的刺激间隔:时间辨别学习中一种新型不对称性普遍性的证据。
Behav Processes. 2010 May;84(1):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
9
Contribution of the retrosplenial cortex to temporal discrimination learning.压后皮质对时间辨别学习的作用。
Hippocampus. 2015 Feb;25(2):137-41. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22385. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination.不同感觉通道之间的注意偏向:对动物时间辨别中使用的内部时钟、记忆和决策阶段的影响。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;423:528-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23457.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognition of Time and Thinking Beyond.时间认知与超越思维
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1455:171-195. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60183-5_10.
2
Temporal scaling and computing time in neural circuits: Should we stop watching the clock and look for its gears?神经回路中的时间尺度与计算时间:我们是否应该不再看时钟,而去寻找其齿轮?
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Dec 8;16:1022713. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1022713. eCollection 2022.
3
Modeling Interval Timing by Recurrent Neural Nets.用循环神经网络对间隔计时进行建模。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2019 Aug 28;13:46. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00046. eCollection 2019.
4
5-HT1a Receptor Involvement in Temporal Memory and the Response to Temporal Ambiguity.5-羟色胺1a受体在时间记忆及对时间模糊性的反应中的作用
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jul 3;12:439. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00439. eCollection 2018.
5
Temporal specificity in Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer.条件性刺激到工具性条件反射的时间特异性。
Learn Mem. 2017 Dec 15;25(1):8-20. doi: 10.1101/lm.046383.117. Print 2018 Jan.
6
A Rescorla-Wagner drift-diffusion model of conditioning and timing.一种关于条件作用和时间的雷斯克拉-瓦格纳漂移扩散模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Nov 2;13(11):e1005796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005796. eCollection 2017 Nov.
7
Cognitive Aging and Time Perception: Roles of Bayesian Optimization and Degeneracy.认知衰老与时间感知:贝叶斯优化与简并性的作用
Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 May 18;8:102. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00102. eCollection 2016.
8
Interval timing, temporal averaging, and cue integration.间隔计时、时间平均和线索整合。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Apr;8:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.004.
9
Temporal Averaging Across Stimuli Signaling the Same or Different Reinforcing Outcomes in the Peak Procedure.在峰值程序中,对发出相同或不同强化结果信号的刺激进行时间平均。
Int J Comp Psychol. 2015;28.
10
Temporal averaging across multiple response options: insight into the mechanisms underlying integration.跨多个反应选项的时间平均:深入了解整合背后的机制。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Mar;19(2):329-42. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0935-4. Epub 2015 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Timing in a variable interval procedure: evidence for a memory singularity.可变间隔程序中的时间安排:记忆奇点的证据。
Behav Processes. 2014 Jan;101:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
2
Temporal memory averaging and post-encoding alterations in temporal expectation.时间记忆平均化与时间预期中的编码后改变。
Behav Processes. 2013 May;95:31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
3
Mice take calculated risks.老鼠会权衡风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 29;109(22):8776-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205131109. Epub 2012 May 16.
4
Motivation and timing: clues for modeling the reward system.动机与时机:奖励系统建模的线索
Behav Processes. 2012 May;90(1):142-53. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
5
Nucleus accumbens dopamine modulates response rate but not response timing in an interval timing task.伏隔核多巴胺在间隔计时任务中调节反应速率,但不调节反应时间。
Behav Neurosci. 2011 Apr;125(2):215-25. doi: 10.1037/a0022892.
6
A heterogeneous population code for elapsed time in rat medial agranular cortex.大鼠内侧无颗粒皮质中用于对消逝时间进行编码的异质性群体。
Behav Neurosci. 2011 Feb;125(1):54-73. doi: 10.1037/a0021954.
7
Stimulus compounding in interval timing: the modality-duration relationship of the anchor durations results in qualitatively different response patterns to the compound cue.间隔计时中的刺激复合:锚定持续时间的模态-持续时间关系导致对复合线索产生质的不同的反应模式。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jan;37(1):94-107. doi: 10.1037/a0020200.
8
Averaging of temporal memories by rats.大鼠对时间记忆的平均化。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jul;35(3):434-9. doi: 10.1037/a0014021.
9
Risk assessment in man and mouse.人和小鼠的风险评估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 17;106(7):2459-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812709106. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
10
Fewer peak trials per session facilitate acquisition of peak responding despite elimination of response rate differences.尽管消除了反应率差异,但每次训练中较少的峰值试验有助于获得峰值反应。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jan;80(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

强化概率调节时间记忆的选择和整合过程。

Reinforcement probability modulates temporal memory selection and integration processes.

作者信息

Matell Matthew S, Kurti Allison N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Villanova University, United States.

Department of Psychology, Villanova University, United States.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.006
PMID:23896560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3903670/
Abstract

We have previously shown that rats trained in a mixed-interval peak procedure (tone=4s, light=12s) respond in a scalar manner at a time in between the trained peak times when presented with the stimulus compound (Swanton & Matell, 2011). In our previous work, the two component cues were reinforced with different probabilities (short=20%, long=80%) to equate response rates, and we found that the compound peak time was biased toward the cue with the higher reinforcement probability. Here, we examined the influence that different reinforcement probabilities have on the temporal location and shape of the compound response function. We found that the time of peak responding shifted as a function of the relative reinforcement probability of the component cues, becoming earlier as the relative likelihood of reinforcement associated with the short cue increased. However, as the relative probabilities of the component cues grew dissimilar, the compound peak became non-scalar, suggesting that the temporal control of behavior shifted from a process of integration to one of selection. As our previous work has utilized durations and reinforcement probabilities more discrepant than those used here, these data suggest that the processes underlying the integration/selection decision for time are based on cue value.

摘要

我们之前已经表明,在混合间隔峰值程序(音调 = 4秒,灯光 = 12秒)中训练的大鼠,在呈现刺激复合物时,会在训练峰值时间之间的某个时间以标量方式做出反应(斯旺顿和马特尔,2011年)。在我们之前的研究中,两个成分线索以不同的概率得到强化(短 = 20%,长 = 80%)以使反应率相等,并且我们发现复合峰值时间偏向于具有更高强化概率的线索。在这里,我们研究了不同强化概率对复合反应函数的时间位置和形状的影响。我们发现峰值反应时间随着成分线索的相对强化概率而变化,随着与短线索相关的强化相对可能性增加而提前。然而,随着成分线索的相对概率变得不同,复合峰值变得非标量,这表明行为的时间控制从整合过程转变为选择过程。由于我们之前的研究使用的持续时间和强化概率比这里使用的更不一致,这些数据表明时间整合/选择决策背后的过程是基于线索价值的。