Institute of Virology University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Germany.
Viruses. 2013 Jul 26;5(8):1924-33. doi: 10.3390/v5081924.
The spike proteins of a number of coronaviruses are able to bind to sialic acids present on the cell surface. The importance of this sialic acid binding ability during infection is, however, quite different. We compared the spike protein of transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) and the spike protein of infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). Whereas sialic acid is the only receptor determinant known so far for IBV, TGEV requires interaction with its receptor aminopeptidase N to initiate infection of cells. Binding tests with soluble spike proteins carrying an IgG Fc-tag revealed pronounced differences between these two viral proteins. Binding of the IBV spike protein to host cells was in all experiments sialic acid dependent, whereas the soluble TGEV spike showed binding to APN but had no detectable sialic acid binding activity. Our results underline the different ways in which binding to sialoglycoconjugates is mediated by coronavirus spike proteins.
多种冠状病毒的刺突蛋白能够与细胞表面存在的唾液酸结合。然而,这种唾液酸结合能力在感染过程中的重要性却大不相同。我们比较了传染性胃肠炎病毒(TGEV)的刺突蛋白和传染性支气管炎病毒(IBV)的刺突蛋白。虽然迄今为止,唾液酸是已知的唯一针对 IBV 的受体决定簇,但 TGEV 需要与其受体氨肽酶 N 相互作用才能启动对细胞的感染。用携带 IgG Fc 标签的可溶性刺突蛋白进行的结合试验显示,这两种病毒蛋白之间存在明显差异。在所有实验中,IBV 刺突蛋白与宿主细胞的结合均依赖于唾液酸,而可溶性 TGEV 刺突蛋白与 APN 结合,但没有检测到唾液酸结合活性。我们的结果强调了冠状病毒刺突蛋白介导与唾液酸糖缀合物结合的不同方式。