• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对 75 岁及以上的选择性男性进行前列腺活检,可指导关键的临床管理决策。

Prostatic biopsies in selected men aged 75 years and older guide key clinical management decisions.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Bedford Hospital, Bedford, UK.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2013 Dec;45(6):1539-44. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0506-z. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-013-0506-z
PMID:23896941
Abstract

PURPOSE

Increasing life expectancy and PSA testing has increased the number of men over the age of seventy-five presenting for investigation of potential prostate malignancies. Prostatic biopsies provide diagnostic information; however, they are invasive and may not alter management decisions. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether prostate biopsies in this age group were justified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All men aged 75 years and older who underwent prostatic biopsies between January 2010 and November 2011 at Bedford Hospital were identified and the indication for the biopsies, histopathological results and subsequent management plan investigated.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-eight (138) prostatic biopsies were undertaken and malignancies identified in 60/138 (43 %) cases. Prebiopsy PSA and examination findings had a poor positive predictive value of 54 %. Fifty-five out of sixty (92 %) cancers were classified as high or medium risk disease with 30/60 (50 %) patients commencing radiotherapy treatment with curative intent.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients aged 75 years or over, prostatic biopsies provide important diagnostic information which directly impacts on clinical decisions, supporting their use in this age group.

摘要

目的

预期寿命的延长和 PSA 检测的增加导致七十五岁以上男性人群中潜在前列腺恶性肿瘤的就诊数量增加。前列腺活检提供诊断信息,但具有侵袭性,且可能不会改变管理决策。因此,本研究旨在探讨在该年龄段进行前列腺活检是否合理。

材料与方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2010 年 1 月至 2011 年 11 月在贝德福德医院接受前列腺活检的所有 75 岁及以上男性患者,分析了活检的适应证、组织病理学结果和后续管理方案。

结果

共进行了 138 例前列腺活检,60/138(43%)例发现恶性肿瘤。活检前 PSA 和检查结果的阳性预测值较低,为 54%。60 例癌症中有 55 例(92%)为高或中危疾病,其中 30 例(50%)患者开始接受有治愈意图的放疗治疗。

结论

在特定的 75 岁及以上患者中,前列腺活检可提供重要的诊断信息,直接影响临床决策,支持在该年龄段使用。

相似文献

1
Prostatic biopsies in selected men aged 75 years and older guide key clinical management decisions.对 75 岁及以上的选择性男性进行前列腺活检,可指导关键的临床管理决策。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2013 Dec;45(6):1539-44. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0506-z. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
2
A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.对于接受前列腺癌主动监测的男性,阴性确认性活检并不能保护他们免于组织学分级进展。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.038. Epub 2013 May 2.
3
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.局限性前列腺癌的治疗:根据其自然病程(通常进展相对缓慢),可选择观察等待、手术或放射治疗。
Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8.
4
Are prostatic biopsies necessary in men aged > or =80 years?80岁及以上男性是否需要进行前列腺活检?
BJU Int. 2007 Feb;99(2):335-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06603.x.
5
Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?适合主动监测的前列腺癌患者的病理升级:前列腺特异性抗原密度有影响吗?
Korean J Urol. 2015 Sep;56(9):624-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.624. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
6
Could prostate biopsies be avoided in men older than 75 years with raised PSA?对于PSA升高的75岁以上男性,是否可以避免进行前列腺活检?
Urol Int. 2010;85(4):410-4. doi: 10.1159/000320378. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
7
An evidence review of active surveillance in men with localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌男性患者主动监测的证据综述。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Dec(204):1-341.
8
Screening for prostate cancer.前列腺癌筛查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3.
9
Factors influencing disease progression of prostate cancer under active surveillance: a McGill University Health Center cohort.主动监测下影响前列腺癌疾病进展的因素:麦吉尔大学健康中心队列研究
BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6b):E99-E104. doi: 10.1111/bju.12754. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
10
Determination of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen helps to avoid unnecessary biopsies in men with normal rectal examinations and total prostate-specific antigen of 4-10 ng/ml.游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比的测定有助于避免对直肠检查正常且总前列腺特异性抗原为4 - 10 ng/ml的男性进行不必要的活检。
Eur Urol. 2000 Mar;37(3):289-96. doi: 10.1159/000052358.

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.前列腺癌死亡率随访 11 年后。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):981-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113135.
2
Radical prostatectomy practice in England.英国的根治性前列腺切除术实践
Urol J. 2010 Fall;7(4):243-8.
3
Could prostate biopsies be avoided in men older than 75 years with raised PSA?对于PSA升高的75岁以上男性,是否可以避免进行前列腺活检?
Urol Int. 2010;85(4):410-4. doi: 10.1159/000320378. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
4
Screening for prostate cancer among men 75 years of age or older.对75岁及以上男性进行前列腺癌筛查。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 11;359(24):2515-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0807209.
5
Predictors of patient preferences and treatment choices for localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌患者偏好及治疗选择的预测因素
Cancer. 2008 Oct 15;113(8):2058-67. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23807.
6
Prostate cancer in elderly men.老年男性前列腺癌
Rev Urol. 2008 Spring;10(2):111-9.
7
Survival associated with treatment vs observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men.老年男性局限性前列腺癌治疗与观察的生存情况比较
JAMA. 2006 Dec 13;296(22):2683-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.22.2683.
8
The prognostic significance of perineural invasion in prostatic cancer biopsies: a systematic review.前列腺癌活检中神经周围浸润的预后意义:一项系统综述。
Cancer. 2007 Jan 1;109(1):13-24. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22388.
9
PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies.预期寿命有限的老年男性的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查。
JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2336-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.19.2336.
10
Prostate specific antigen testing in men older than 75 years in the United States.美国75岁以上男性的前列腺特异性抗原检测
J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):511-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.060.