Wardrop Douglas, Estcourt Lise J, Brunskill Susan J, Doree Carolyn, Trivella Marialena, Stanworth Simon, Murphy Michael F
Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Haematology, Oxford, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 29(7):CD009733. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009733.pub2.
Patients with haematological disorders are frequently at risk of severe or life-threatening bleeding as a result of thrombocytopenia. This is despite the routine use of prophylactic platelet transfusions (PlTx) to prevent bleeding once the platelet count falls below a certain threshold. PlTx are not without risk and adverse events may be life-threatening. A possible adjunct to prophylactic PlTxs is the use of antifibrinolytics, specifically the lysine analogues tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA).
To determine the efficacy and safety of antifibrinolytics (lysine analogues) in preventing bleeding in patients with haematological disorders.
We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 12, 2012), MEDLINE (1948 to 10 January 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 10 January 2013), CINAHL (1982 to 10 January 2013), PubMed (e-publications only) and the Transfusion Evidence Library (1980 to January 2013). We also searched several international and ongoing trial databases to 10 January 2013 and citation-tracked relevant reference lists.
RCTs involving patients with haematological disorders, who would routinely require prophylactic platelet transfusions to prevent bleeding. We only included trials involving the use of the lysine analogues TXA and EACA.
Two authors independently screened all electronically derived citations and abstracts of papers, identified by the review search strategy, for relevancy. Two authors independently assessed the full text of all potentially relevant trials for eligibility, completed the data extraction and assessed the studies for risk of bias using The Cochrane Collaboration's 'Risk of bias' tool. We requested missing data from one author but the data were no longer available. The outcomes are reported narratively: we performed no meta-analyses because of the heterogeneity of the available data.
Of 470 articles initially identified, 436 were excluded on the basis of the title and abstract. We reviewed 34 full-text articles from which four studies reported in five articles were eligible for inclusion. We did not identify any RCTs which compared TXA with EACA. We did not identify any ongoing RCTs.One cross-over TXA study (eight patients) was excluded from the outcome analysis because data from this study were at a high risk of bias. Data from the other three studies were all at unclear risk of bias due to lack of reporting of study methodology.Three studies (two TXA (12 to 56 patients), one EACA (18 patients)) reported in four articles (published 1983 to 1995) were included in the narrative review. All three studies compared the drug with placebo.All studies reported bleeding, but it was reported in different ways. All three studies suggested antifibrinolytics reduced the risk of bleeding. The first study showed a difference in average bleeding score of 42 in placebo (P) versus three (TXA). The second study only showed a difference in bleeding episodes during consolidation chemotherapy, with a mean of 2.6 episodes/patient (standard deviation (SD) 2.2) (P) versus a mean of 1.1 episodes/patient (SD 1.4) (TXA). The third study reported bleeding on 50% of days at risk (P) versus bleeding on 31% of days at risk (EACA).Two studies (68 patients) reported thromboembolism and no events occurred.All three studies reported a reduction in PlTx usage. The first study reported a difference of 222 platelet units (P) versus 69 platelet units (TXA). The second study only showed a difference in total platelet usage during consolidation chemotherapy, with a mean of 9.3 units (SD 3.3) (P) versus 3.7 (SD 4.1) (TXA). The third study reported one PlTx every 10.5 days at risk (P) versus one PlTx every 13.3 days at risk (EACA).Two studies reported red cell transfusion requirements and one study found a reduction in red cell transfusion usage.One study reported death due to bleeding as an outcome measure and none occurred.Only one study reported adverse events of TXA as an outcome measure and none occurred.None of the studies reported on the following pre-specified outcomes: overall mortality, adverse events of transfusion, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) or quality of life (QoL).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the evidence available for the use of antifibrinolytics in haematology patients is very limited. The only available data suggest that TXA and EACA may be useful adjuncts to platelet transfusions so that platelet use, and the complications associated with their use, can be reduced. However, the trials were too small to assess whether antifibrinolytics increased the risk of thromboembolic events. Large, high-quality RCTs are required before antifibrinolytics can be demonstrated to be efficacious and safe in widespread clinical practice.
血液系统疾病患者常因血小板减少而面临严重或危及生命的出血风险。尽管一旦血小板计数降至特定阈值以下,通常会使用预防性血小板输注(PlTx)来预防出血,但PlTx并非没有风险,不良事件可能危及生命。预防性PlTx的一种可能辅助手段是使用抗纤溶药物,特别是赖氨酸类似物氨甲环酸(TXA)和ε-氨基己酸(EACA)。
确定抗纤溶药物(赖氨酸类似物)在预防血液系统疾病患者出血方面的疗效和安全性。
我们在Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL 2012年第12期)、MEDLINE(1948年至2013年1月10日)、EMBASE(198年至2013年1月10日)、CINAHL(1982年至2013年1月10日)、PubMed(仅电子出版物)和输血证据库(1980年至2013年1月)中检索随机对照试验(RCT)。我们还检索了截至2013年1月10日的几个国际和正在进行的试验数据库,并对相关参考文献列表进行了引文跟踪。
涉及血液系统疾病患者的RCT,这些患者通常需要预防性血小板输注以预防出血。我们仅纳入了涉及使用赖氨酸类似物TXA和EACA的试验。
两位作者独立筛选所有通过综述检索策略识别的电子文献引文和论文摘要,以确定其相关性。两位作者独立评估所有潜在相关试验的全文是否符合纳入标准,完成数据提取,并使用Cochrane协作网的“偏倚风险”工具评估研究的偏倚风险。我们向一位作者索要缺失数据,但数据已无法获取。结果以叙述形式报告:由于现有数据的异质性,我们未进行荟萃分析。
在最初识别的470篇文章中,436篇基于标题和摘要被排除。我们审查了34篇全文文章,其中五篇文章中报告的四项研究符合纳入标准。我们未识别出任何比较TXA与EACA的RCT。我们未识别出任何正在进行的RCT。一项交叉TXA研究(8名患者)因该研究数据存在高偏倚风险而被排除在结果分析之外。由于缺乏研究方法的报告,其他三项研究的数据均存在不明确的偏倚风险。四项文章(发表于1983年至1995年)中报告的三项研究(两项TXA研究(12至56名患者),一项EACA研究(18名患者))被纳入叙述性综述。所有三项研究均将药物与安慰剂进行比较。所有研究均报告了出血情况,但报告方式不同。所有三项研究均表明抗纤溶药物降低了出血风险。第一项研究显示,安慰剂组(P)的平均出血评分为42,而TXA组为3。第二项研究仅显示在巩固化疗期间出血事件存在差异,安慰剂组平均为2.6次/患者(标准差(SD)2.2)(P),而TXA组平均为1.1次/患者(SD 1.4)。第三项研究报告,有风险天数的50%出现出血(P),而EACA组为有风险天数的31%出现出血。两项研究(68名患者)报告了血栓栓塞事件,且未发生任何事件。所有三项研究均报告PlTx使用量减少。第一项研究报告,血小板单位差异为安慰剂组222单位(P),而TXA组为69单位。第二项研究仅显示在巩固化疗期间总血小板使用量存在差异,安慰剂组平均为9.3单位(SD 3.3)(P),而TXA组为3.7单位(SD 4.1)。第三项研究报告,有风险天数每10.5天进行一次PlTx(P),而EACA组为每13.3天进行一次PlTx。两项研究报告了红细胞输注需求,一项研究发现红细胞输注使用量减少。一项研究将因出血导致的死亡作为结局指标,未发生此类情况。仅有一项研究将TXA的不良事件作为结局指标,未发生任何事件。没有研究报告以下预先设定的结局:总死亡率、输血不良事件、弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)或生活质量(QoL)。
我们的结果表明,血液学患者使用抗纤溶药物的现有证据非常有限。仅有的可用数据表明,TXA和EACA可能是血小板输注的有用辅助手段,从而可以减少血小板的使用及其相关并发症。然而,这些试验规模太小,无法评估抗纤溶药物是否增加了血栓栓塞事件的风险。在抗纤溶药物能够在广泛的临床实践中被证明有效且安全之前,需要进行大型、高质量的RCT。