Tay Jason, Allan David, Beattie Sara, Bredeson Christopher, Fergusson Dean, Maze Dawn, Sabloff Mitchell, Thavorn Kednapa, Tinmouth Alan
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 24;6(10):e013483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013483.
In patients with transient thrombocytopenia being treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell rescue-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), prophylactic transfusions are standard therapy to prevent bleeding. However, a recent multicentre trial suggests that prophylactic platelet transfusions in HSCT may not be necessary. Additionally, the potential overuse of platelet products places a burden on a scarce healthcare resource. Moreover, the benefit of prophylactic platelet transfusions to prevent clinically relevant haemorrhage is debatable. Current randomised data compare different thresholds for administering prophylactic platelets or prophylactic versus therapeutic platelet transfusions. An alternative strategy involves prescribing prophylactic antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid to prevent bleeding.
This report describes the design of an open-labelled randomised pilot study comparing the prophylactic use of oral tranexamic acid with platelet transfusions in the setting of autologous HSCT. In 3-5 centres, 100 patients undergoing autologous HSCT will be randomly assigned to either a prophylactic tranexamic acid or prophylactic platelets bleeding prevention strategy-based daily platelet values up to 30 days post-transplant. The study will be stratified by centre and type of transplant. The primary goal is to demonstrate study feasibility while collecting clinical outcomes on (1) WHO and Bleeding Severity Measurement Scale (BSMS), (2) transplant-related mortality, (3) quality of life, (4) length of hospital stay, (5) intensive care unit admission rates, (6) Bearman toxicity scores, (7) incidence of infections, (8) transfusion requirements, (9) adverse reactions and (10) economic analyses.
This study is funded by a peer-reviewed grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (201 503) and is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02650791. It has been approved by the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board. Study results will presented at national and international conferences. Importantly, the results of this trial will inform the feasibility and conduct of a larger study.
NCT02650791; Pre-results.
在接受大剂量化疗后进行干细胞救援——造血干细胞移植(HSCT)治疗的短暂性血小板减少症患者中,预防性输血是预防出血的标准疗法。然而,最近一项多中心试验表明,HSCT中预防性血小板输血可能并非必要。此外,血小板制品的潜在过度使用给稀缺的医疗资源带来了负担。而且,预防性血小板输血预防临床相关出血的益处存在争议。目前的随机数据比较了预防性血小板给药的不同阈值或预防性与治疗性血小板输血。另一种策略是开具预防性抗纤维蛋白溶解剂,如氨甲环酸,以预防出血。
本报告描述了一项开放标签随机试点研究的设计,该研究比较了在自体HSCT情况下口服氨甲环酸与血小板输血的预防性使用。在3至5个中心,100名接受自体HSCT的患者将根据移植后30天内的每日血小板值,随机分配到基于预防性氨甲环酸或预防性血小板的出血预防策略组。研究将按中心和移植类型进行分层。主要目标是证明研究的可行性,同时收集关于以下方面的临床结果:(1)世界卫生组织(WHO)和出血严重程度测量量表(BSMS),(2)移植相关死亡率,(3)生活质量,(4)住院时间,(5)重症监护病房入住率,(6)贝尔曼毒性评分,(7)感染发生率,(8)输血需求,(9)不良反应,以及(10)经济分析。
本研究由加拿大卫生研究院(201503)的同行评审拨款资助,并在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT02650791。它已获得渥太华健康科学网络研究伦理委员会的批准。研究结果将在国内和国际会议上公布。重要的是,该试验的结果将为更大规模研究的可行性和实施提供参考。
NCT02650791;预结果