Ranta Marin E, Chen Min, Crocetti Deana, Prince Jerry L, Subramaniam Krish, Fischl Bruce, Kaufmann Walter E, Mostofsky Stewart H
Kennedy Krieger Institute, Laboratory for Neurocognitive Imaging and Research, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 May;35(5):2009-26. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22309. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
Examination of associations between specific disorders and physical properties of functionally relevant frontal lobe sub-regions is a fundamental goal in neuropsychiatry. Here, we present and evaluate automated methods of frontal lobe parcellation with the programs FreeSurfer(FS) and TOADS-CRUISE(T-C), based on the manual method described in Ranta et al. [2009]: Psychiatry Res 172:147-154 in which sulcal-gyral landmarks were used to manually delimit functionally relevant regions within the frontal lobe: i.e., primary motor cortex, anterior cingulate, deep white matter, premotor cortex regions (supplementary motor complex, frontal eye field, and lateral premotor cortex) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions (medial PFC, dorsolateral PFC, inferior PFC, lateral orbitofrontal cortex [OFC] and medial OFC). Dice's coefficient, a measure of overlap, and percent volume difference were used to measure the reliability between manual and automated delineations for each frontal lobe region. For FS, mean Dice's coefficient for all regions was 0.75 and percent volume difference was 21.2%. For T-C the mean Dice's coefficient was 0.77 and the mean percent volume difference for all regions was 20.2%. These results, along with a high degree of agreement between the two automated methods (mean Dice's coefficient = 0.81, percent volume difference = 12.4%) and a proof-of-principle group difference analysis that highlights the consistency and sensitivity of the automated methods, indicate that the automated methods are valid techniques for parcellation of the frontal lobe into functionally relevant sub-regions. Thus, the methodology has the potential to increase efficiency, statistical power and reproducibility for population analyses of neuropsychiatric disorders with hypothesized frontal lobe contributions.
研究特定疾病与功能相关额叶亚区域物理特性之间的关联是神经精神病学的一个基本目标。在此,我们基于Ranta等人[2009年:《精神病学研究》172:147 - 154]中描述的手动方法,展示并评估使用FreeSurfer(FS)和TOADS - CRUISE(T - C)程序进行额叶分割的自动化方法。在该手动方法中,利用脑沟 - 脑回标志手动划定额叶内功能相关区域,即初级运动皮层、前扣带回、深部白质、运动前区皮层区域(辅助运动复合体、额叶眼区和外侧运动前区皮层)以及前额叶皮层(PFC)区域(内侧PFC、背外侧PFC、下PFC、外侧眶额皮层[OFC]和内侧OFC)。使用衡量重叠程度的迪赛系数和体积百分比差异来测量每个额叶区域手动和自动划定之间的可靠性。对于FS,所有区域的平均迪赛系数为0.75,体积百分比差异为21.2%。对于T - C,平均迪赛系数为0.77,所有区域的平均体积百分比差异为20.2%。这些结果,连同两种自动化方法之间的高度一致性(平均迪赛系数 = 0.81,体积百分比差异 = 12.4%)以及突出自动化方法一致性和敏感性的原理验证组差异分析,表明自动化方法是将额叶分割为功能相关亚区域的有效技术。因此,该方法有潜力提高对具有假设额叶贡献的神经精神疾病进行群体分析的效率、统计功效和可重复性。