• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[心肌血运重建]

[Myocardial revascularization].

作者信息

Möllmann H, Szardien S, Kempfert J, Nef H, Liebetrau C, Walther T, Hamm C

机构信息

Abteilung für Kardiologie, Kerckhoff-Klinik Bad Nauheim, Benekestrasse 2-8, Bad Nauheim, Germany.

出版信息

Herz. 2013 Aug;38(5):513-26; quiz 527-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3917-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00059-013-3917-9
PMID:23897600
Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in western countries and is of significant socio-economic importance due to its increasing prevalence. Until percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were established, CAD could only be treated by surgical revascularization or pharmacological therapy. In-stent restenosis remains a major problem after stent implantation. However, the use of new materials and stent coatings have led to a significant reduction in in-stent restenosis. Thus, surgical revascularization and PCI are currently of equal value for the treatment of CAD. The decision-making for PCI or surgical revascularization depends on various factors such as number of diseased vessels, complexity of the coronary stenoses, concomitant diseases, and the patient's general condition. The therapeutic regime of every patient should be adjusted to the recommendations of the European and German Society for Cardiology, while controversial and complex cases should be discussed in an interdisciplinary case conference ("heart team").

摘要

冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是西方国家发病和死亡的主要原因,由于其患病率不断上升,具有重大的社会经济意义。在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)确立之前,CAD只能通过外科血管重建术或药物治疗。支架内再狭窄仍然是支架植入后的一个主要问题。然而,新材料和支架涂层的使用已导致支架内再狭窄显著减少。因此,目前外科血管重建术和PCI在CAD治疗中具有同等价值。PCI或外科血管重建术的决策取决于多种因素,如病变血管数量、冠状动脉狭窄的复杂性、伴随疾病以及患者的一般状况。每位患者的治疗方案应根据欧洲和德国心脏病学会的建议进行调整,而有争议和复杂的病例应在跨学科病例讨论会上(“心脏团队”)进行讨论。

相似文献

1
[Myocardial revascularization].[心肌血运重建]
Herz. 2013 Aug;38(5):513-26; quiz 527-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3917-9.
2
[Myocardial revascularization].[心肌血运重建]
Internist (Berl). 2012 Sep;53(9):1063-75; quiz 1076-8. doi: 10.1007/s00108-012-3035-4.
3
Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: An Updated Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.大隐静脉移植血管介入治疗中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较:随机试验的最新综合荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):758-767. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
4
Detection of stent restenosis in single vessel CAD: comparison of 201Tl and gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT.单支血管冠状动脉疾病中支架再狭窄的检测:201Tl与门控99mTc-MIBI SPECT的比较
Nucl Med Commun. 2004 May;25(5):479-86. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200405000-00009.
5
Clinical experience of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease at Bangkok Heart Institute.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2003 May;86 Suppl 1:S76-82.
6
Stent placement to prevent restenosis after angioplasty in small coronary arteries.在小冠状动脉血管成形术后放置支架以预防再狭窄。
Circulation. 2001 Oct 23;104(17):2029-33.
7
Arterial stiffness in patients with coronary artery disease: relation with in-stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention.冠心病患者的动脉僵硬度:与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架内再狭窄的关系。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Jun 6;16:128. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0305-4.
8
Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stents With Bare-Metal Stents for PCI of Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于隐静脉桥病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Dec;28(12):E139-E169. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
9
Degradable, drug-eluting stents: a new frontier for the treatment of coronary artery disease.可降解药物洗脱支架:冠心病治疗的新前沿。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005 Nov;2(6):667-71. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2.6.667.
10
Current issues in coronary stent technology.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2009 Jul;223(5):515-24. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM541.

本文引用的文献

1
Off-Pump versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis and Consensus Statement From The 2004 ISMICS Consensus Conference.非体外循环与传统冠状动脉旁路移植术:2004年国际微创心血管外科学会共识会议的荟萃分析与共识声明
Innovations (Phila). 2005 Fall;1(1):3-27. doi: 10.1097/01243895-200512000-00002.
2
ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)管理工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Dec;32(23):2999-3054. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
3
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.比较冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干和/或三血管病变:SYNTAX 试验 3 年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(17):2125-34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
4
Aortic no-touch technique makes the difference in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.主动脉非接触技术使非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术有所不同。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Dec;142(6):1499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
5
Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7): a randomised factorial trial.急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时的双联(氯吡格雷标准剂量与双倍剂量和阿司匹林低剂量与高剂量)治疗(CURRENT-OASIS 7):一项随机析因试验。
Lancet. 2010 Oct 9;376(9748):1233-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61088-4.
6
Perioperative outcomes in hybrid versus conventional surgical coronary artery revascularisation.杂交手术与传统外科冠状动脉血运重建的围手术期结局
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;11(3):292-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.239178. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
7
Impact of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation on postoperative outcome in high-risk cardiac surgery patients: a multicentre, propensity-score analysis.高危心脏手术患者预防性主动脉内球囊反搏对术后转归的影响:一项多中心、倾向评分分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Nov;38(5):585-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.03.017.
8
Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study.随机双盲评估替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中的抗血小板作用的起效和失效:ONSET/OFFSET 研究。
Circulation. 2009 Dec 22;120(25):2577-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.912550. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
9
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于急性冠脉综合征患者的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 10;361(11):1045-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327. Epub 2009 Aug 30.
10
Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2008. A report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2008年德国的心脏外科手术。代表德国胸心血管外科学会的一份报告。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Sep;57(6):315-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185915. Epub 2009 Aug 25.