• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药房发起的注射泵输注系统实施。

Pharmacy-initiated implementation of a syringe pump infusion system.

作者信息

Goudreau J B, Morrissey J M

出版信息

Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Mar;42(3):584-7.

PMID:3985022
Abstract

The approach taken by a pharmacy department of a 310-bed community hospital to evaluate and implement a syringe infusion pump system is described. The cost of the minibag system used by the hospital was compared with the cost of the syringe system. A trial of the system involving three medications was implemented in two patient-care areas. After a six-week period, nurses favored expansion of the new system. After a detailed cost comparison was presented to hospital administration, hospitalwide conversion to the new system was approved. Groups of drugs were gradually added to the dispensing list. At the end of a five-month period, 80% of secondary intravenous medications were administered via the new system. Advice is offered to other hospitals considering the system. A smooth transition to a syringe infusion system was the result of the well-planned approach.

摘要

本文描述了一家拥有310张床位的社区医院药房评估和实施注射器输液泵系统的方法。将医院使用的微量袋系统成本与注射器系统成本进行了比较。在两个患者护理区域对该系统进行了涉及三种药物的试验。六周后,护士们倾向于扩大新系统的使用。在向医院管理层提交详细的成本比较报告后,全院改用新系统的提议获得批准。药物组逐渐被添加到处方清单中。在五个月结束时,80%的二级静脉用药通过新系统给药。本文为其他考虑采用该系统的医院提供了建议。精心规划的方法使得顺利过渡到注射器输液系统成为可能。

相似文献

1
Pharmacy-initiated implementation of a syringe pump infusion system.药房发起的注射泵输注系统实施。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Mar;42(3):584-7.
2
Implementation and cost analysis of a syringe pump system for intermittent i.v. drug delivery.间歇性静脉给药注射器泵系统的实施与成本分析
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Mar;42(3):581-4.
3
Cost comparison of two systems for intermittent intravenous administration of small-volume injections.两种小容量注射剂间歇性静脉给药系统的成本比较
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Feb;42(2):323-8.
4
Cost and acceptability of three syringe-pump infusion systems.三种注射泵输注系统的成本与可接受性
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Aug;47(8):1794-8.
5
Evaluation of a multiple-dose syringe pump system for intermittent i.v. drug delivery.用于间歇性静脉给药的多剂量注射泵系统的评估。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Oct;43(10):2474-8.
6
Comparison of seven methods of preparing and administering small-volume injections.七种小容量注射剂配制与给药方法的比较
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1988 Sep;45(9):1896-901.
7
A cost comparison of intravenous cimetidine delivery systems.静脉注射西咪替丁给药系统的成本比较。
Hosp Pharm. 1990 Dec;25(12):1085-9.
8
Syringes versus minibags as an intravenous admixture system: a comparison of cost and nursing preference.注射器与微型袋作为静脉内混合系统的比较:成本与护理偏好对比
Can J Hosp Pharm. 1987 Jun;40(3):81-5.
9
A cost benefit comparison of two antibiotic delivery systems in a children's hospital.儿童医院中两种抗生素给药系统的成本效益比较。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Oct;38(5):144-6.
10
Comparison of automated and manual methods of syringe filling.注射器填充的自动化方法与手动方法的比较。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Nov;47(11):2492-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct costs of intravenous delivery systems.静脉输液系统的直接成本。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Jul;4(1):8-13. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304010-00003.