• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的支架血栓形成:来自前瞻性、随机 PLATO 试验的分析。

Stent thrombosis with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the prospective, randomized PLATO trial.

机构信息

INSERM-Unité 698, Hôpital Bichat, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, Paris, France.

出版信息

Circulation. 2013 Sep 3;128(10):1055-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002589. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002589
PMID:23900047
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe the effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on stent thrombosis in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 18 624 patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes, 11 289 (61%) had at least 1 intracoronary stent. Ticagrelor reduced stent thrombosis compared with clopidogrel across all definitions: definite, 1.37% (n=71) versus 1.93% (n=105; hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.90; P=0.0091); definite or probable, 2.21% (n=118) versus 2.87% (n=157; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95; P=0.017); and definite, probable, and possible, 2.94% (n=154) versus 3.77 (n=201; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95). The reduction in definite stent thrombosis was consistent regardless of acute coronary syndrome type, presence of diabetes mellitus, stent type (drug-eluting or bare metal stent), CYP2C19 genetic status, loading dose of aspirin, dose of clopidogrel before randomization, and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors at randomization. The reduction in stent thrombosis with ticagrelor was numerically greater for late (>30 days; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.96) and subacute (4 hours-30 days; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93) compared with acute (<24 hours; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.43-2.05) stent thrombosis or for patients compliant to therapy (ie, taking blinded study treatment ≥80% of the time) compared with less compliant patients. Randomization to ticagrelor was a strong independent inverse predictor of definite stent thrombosis (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.88).

CONCLUSION

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel reduces the incidence of stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes, with consistent benefit across a broad range of patient, stent, and treatment characteristics.

摘要

背景

我们旨在描述血小板抑制和患者结局(PLATO)试验中替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对支架血栓形成的影响。

方法和结果

在因急性冠状动脉综合征住院的 18624 例患者中,有 11289 例(61%)至少有 1 个冠状动脉内支架。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛降低了所有定义的支架血栓形成:明确的支架血栓形成,替格瑞洛组为 1.37%(n=71),氯吡格雷组为 1.93%(n=105;风险比[HR],0.67;95%置信区间[CI],0.50-0.90;P=0.0091);明确或可能的支架血栓形成,替格瑞洛组为 2.21%(n=118),氯吡格雷组为 2.87%(n=157;HR,0.75;95%CI,0.59-0.95;P=0.017);明确、可能和很可能的支架血栓形成,替格瑞洛组为 2.94%(n=154),氯吡格雷组为 3.77%(n=201;HR,0.77;95%CI,0.62-0.95)。无论急性冠状动脉综合征类型、是否合并糖尿病、支架类型(药物洗脱支架或金属裸支架)、CYP2C19 遗传状态、阿司匹林负荷剂量、随机分组前氯吡格雷剂量以及随机分组时是否使用糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂,替格瑞洛降低明确支架血栓形成的效果均一致。替格瑞洛治疗组迟发(>30 天;HR,0.48;95%CI,0.24-0.96)和亚急性(4 小时-30 天;HR,0.60;95%CI,0.39-0.93)支架血栓形成的风险低于氯吡格雷组,而替格瑞洛治疗组急性(<24 小时;HR,0.94;95%CI,0.43-2.05)支架血栓形成的风险与氯吡格雷组相似。与不依从治疗的患者(即,接受盲法研究治疗的时间<80%)相比,替格瑞洛组依从治疗的患者(即,接受盲法研究治疗的时间≥80%)发生明确支架血栓形成的风险更低。替格瑞洛随机分组是明确支架血栓形成的一个强有力的独立负向预测因子(HR,0.65;95%CI,0.48-0.88)。

结论

与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛可降低急性冠状动脉综合征患者支架血栓形成的发生率,在广泛的患者、支架和治疗特征中具有一致的获益。

相似文献

1
Stent thrombosis with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the prospective, randomized PLATO trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的支架血栓形成:来自前瞻性、随机 PLATO 试验的分析。
Circulation. 2013 Sep 3;128(10):1055-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002589. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
2
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes: a substudy from the prospective randomized PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于老年急性冠脉综合征患者的疗效比较:前瞻性随机血小板抑制与患者预后(PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes,PLATO)试验的一项子研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):680-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964395.
3
Prior smoking status, clinical outcomes, and the comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes-insights from the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.既往吸烟状况、临床结局及替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征中的比较——来自血小板抑制和患者结局(PLATO)试验的观察。
Am Heart J. 2012 Sep;164(3):334-342.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
4
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于行冠状动脉旁路移植术的急性冠状动脉综合征患者:来自 PLATO(血小板抑制和患者结局)试验的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 8;57(6):672-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.029. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
5
Reduction in first and recurrent cardiovascular events with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the PLATO Study.PLATO 研究显示,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛降低了首次和复发的心血管事件。
Circulation. 2013 Feb 12;127(6):673-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.124248. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
6
Impact of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Analysis from the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Trial.糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂对替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相比在急性冠脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性的影响:来自血小板抑制和患者预后(PLATO)试验的分析
Am Heart J. 2016 Jul;177:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
7
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes in relation to renal function: results from the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在肾功能相关的急性冠状动脉综合征中的比较:来自血小板抑制和患者结局(PLATO)试验的结果。
Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11):1056-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.933796. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
8
Health-related quality of life of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes-results from the PLATO trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于急性冠脉综合征患者的健康相关生活质量比较:来自 PLATO 试验的结果。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):574-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 May 15.
9
Factors contributing to the lower mortality with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.导致行经冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者使用替格瑞洛较氯吡格雷死亡率更低的因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 23;60(17):1623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
10
Ticagrelor effects on myocardial infarction and the impact of event adjudication in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial.替格瑞洛对心肌梗死的影响及 PLATO(血小板抑制和患者结局)试验中的事件判定的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 22;63(15):1493-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.038. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Reply to Letter to the Editor: "What Is the Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Small Diameter Stents?".致编辑信件的回复:“2型糖尿病合并小直径支架患者的最佳抗血小板治疗方案是什么?”
Anatol J Cardiol. 2025 Jun 30;29(8):450-1. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.5348.
2
Cangrelor in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.坎格雷洛用于院外心脏骤停后接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 27;14(1):76. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010076.
3
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Taiwanese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.
台湾急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用低剂量普拉格雷的临床疗效与安全性
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 27;13(23):7221. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237221.
4
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in East-Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Large Cohort Study.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在东亚急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的临床结局比较:大型队列研究。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023 Sep;23(5):573-581. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00603-7. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
5
Recent Advances in Stent Technology: Do They Reduce Cardiovascular Events?支架技术的最新进展:它们是否降低心血管事件?
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2022 Sep;24(9):731-744. doi: 10.1007/s11883-022-01049-z. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
6
Abbreviated versus Standard Duration of DAPT after PCI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.PCI 后 DAPT 的缩短与标准疗程:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022 Nov;22(6):633-645. doi: 10.1007/s40256-022-00541-w. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
7
A Rare Case of Coronary Stent Thrombosis in the Modern Era.现代罕见冠状动脉支架血栓形成病例
Cureus. 2022 May 22;14(5):e25207. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25207. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Safety and efficacy of immediate heparin reversal with protamine after complex percutaneous coronary intervention.复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后应用鱼精蛋白即刻逆转肝素的安全性和有效性。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 May 10;22(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02650-5.
9
Double Whammy: Subacute Stent Thrombosis While Being Adherent to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Including Ticagrelor, Followed by Multiple Coronary Artery Aneurysms in a COVID-19 Patient.双重打击:一名新冠病毒肺炎患者在坚持包括替格瑞洛在内的双联抗血小板治疗时发生亚急性支架血栓形成,随后出现多个冠状动脉瘤
Cureus. 2022 Feb 4;14(2):e21908. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21908. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Current Perspectives on Antithrombotic Therapy for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征抗栓治疗的当前观点
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Mar 3;15:2397-2414. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S289295. eCollection 2022.