Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, 103 Daehakro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799,Korea.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;140(3):557-65. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2645-4. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
Lifestyle factors have been chronologically changed into western style ones, which could result in the rapid increase of breast cancer incidence in Korea. It is plausible that reproductive factors through hormonal mechanisms are differentially related to the risk of breast cancer subtypes. We investigated the association of reproductive risk factors on breast cancer by birth year groups and also evaluated the differential associations on the hormone receptor-defined subtypes. Using the data from the Seoul Breast Cancer Study (SeBCS), a multicenter case-control study, 3,332 breast cancer patients and 3,620 control subjects were analyzed. The distribution of subtypes among cases was as follows: 61.0 % estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, 51.9 % progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, and 43.4 % both ER/PR-positive status, respectively. Polytomous logistic regression and Wald tests for heterogeneity have been used across the subtypes. The frequencies of reproductive-related risk factors including early age at menarche, nulligravid, age at first full-term pregnancy (FFTP), duration of estrogen exposure before FFTP (EEBF), less number of children, never breastfeeding, and short duration of breastfeeding has increased as women were born later in both cases and controls, respectively (p trend < 0.0001. Among breast cancer patients, either ER- or PR-positive subtypes were increased in women born in 1960s compared to women born in 1940s. Early age at menarche increased the risk of breast cancer regardless of the subtypes while nulligravid, late age at FFTP, and longer duration of EEBP were associated with hormone receptor-positive cancer risk only (p heterogeneity < 0.05), which associations were stronger among women born later. Our results suggest that the associations of age at menarche, parity, age at FFTP, and duration of EEBF with breast cancer risk were different based on the hormone receptor status and birth year groups in Korea.
生活方式因素已逐渐西化,这可能导致韩国乳腺癌发病率的迅速上升。通过激素机制,生殖因素可能与乳腺癌亚型的风险存在差异相关。我们通过出生年份组研究了生殖危险因素与乳腺癌的相关性,并评估了激素受体定义的亚型的差异相关性。利用来自首尔乳腺癌研究(SeBCS)的多中心病例对照研究的数据,分析了 3332 名乳腺癌患者和 3620 名对照者。病例中各亚型的分布如下:61.0%雌激素受体(ER)阳性、51.9%孕激素受体(PR)阳性、43.4%ER/PR 均阳性。多分类逻辑回归和 Wald 异质性检验用于所有亚型。生殖相关危险因素的频率,包括初潮年龄较早、未生育、首次足月妊娠年龄(FFTP)、FFTP 前雌激素暴露时间(EEBF)、子女数量较少、从未母乳喂养以及母乳喂养时间较短,在病例和对照组中均随女性出生时间的推移而增加(p 趋势<0.0001)。在乳腺癌患者中,与 1940 年代出生的女性相比,1960 年代出生的女性 ER-或 PR-阳性亚型的比例增加。初潮年龄较早增加了乳腺癌的风险,而未生育、FFTP 年龄较晚和 EEBF 时间较长仅与激素受体阳性癌症风险相关(p 异质性<0.05),且这些关联在较晚出生的女性中更强。我们的研究结果表明,在韩国,初潮年龄、产次、FFTP 年龄和 EEBF 时间与乳腺癌风险的相关性因激素受体状态和出生年份组而异。