Shenandoah Valley Family Practice Residency, Front Royal, Virginia, USA.
BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 30;3(7):e002931. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002931.
To assess factors related to use and non-use of a sophisticated interactive preventive health record (IPHR) designed to promote uptake of 18 recommended clinical preventive services; little is known about how patients want to use or be engaged by such advanced information tools.
Descriptive and interpretive qualitative analysis of transcripts and field notes from focus groups of the IPHR users and of patients who were invited but did not use the IPHR (non-users). Grounded theory techniques were then applied via an editing approach for key emergent themes.
Primary care patients in eight practices of the Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network (ACORN).
Three focus groups involved a total of 14 IPHR users and two groups of non-users totalled 14 participants.
OUTCOMES/RESULTS: For themes identified (relevance, trust and functionality) participants indicated that endorsement and use of the IPHR by their personal clinician was vital. In particular, participants' comments linked the IPHR use to: (1) integrating the IPHR into current care, (2) promoting effective patient-clinician encounters and communication and (3) their confidence in the accuracy, security and privacy of the information.
In addition to patients' stated desires for advanced functionality and information accuracy and privacy, successful adoption of the IPHRs by primary care patients depends on such technology's relevance, and on its promotion via integration with primary care practices' processes and the patient-clinician relationship. Accordingly, models of technological success and adoption, when applied to primary care, may need to include the patient-clinician relationship and practice workflow. These findings are important for healthcare providers, the information technology industry and policymakers who share an interest in encouraging patients to use personal health records.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00589173.
评估与使用和不使用复杂交互式预防保健记录(IPHR)相关的因素,该记录旨在促进接受 18 项推荐的临床预防服务;对于患者如何希望使用或参与此类先进信息工具,人们知之甚少。
对 IPHR 用户和受邀但未使用 IPHR(非用户)的患者的焦点小组的转录本和现场记录进行描述性和解释性定性分析。然后,通过编辑方法应用扎根理论技术,以获取关键的新兴主题。
弗吉尼亚门诊保健结果研究网络(ACORN)的 8 个实践中的初级保健患者。
共有 14 名 IPHR 用户参加了 3 个焦点小组,2 个非用户小组共 14 名参与者。
结果/结果:对于确定的主题(相关性、信任和功能),参与者表示,他们的私人临床医生对 IPHR 的认可和使用至关重要。特别是,参与者的评论将 IPHR 的使用与以下方面联系起来:(1)将 IPHR 整合到当前护理中,(2)促进有效的医患互动和沟通,以及(3)他们对信息准确性、安全性和隐私的信心。
除了患者对高级功能和信息准确性和隐私的要求外,初级保健患者成功采用 IPHR 还取决于该技术的相关性,以及通过与初级保健实践流程和医患关系的整合来推广该技术。因此,当应用于初级保健时,技术成功和采用的模型可能需要包括医患关系和实践工作流程。这些发现对于医疗保健提供者、信息技术行业和政策制定者都很重要,他们都有兴趣鼓励患者使用个人健康记录。
Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00589173。