University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cognitive Science Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 's Heeren Loo Groot-Emaus, Ermelo, The Netherlands.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Jan;58(1):3-16. doi: 10.1111/jir.12068. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) are characterised by inhibition deficits; however, the magnitude of these deficits is still subject to debate. This meta-analytic study therefore has two aims: first to assess the magnitude of inhibition deficits in ID, and second to investigate inhibition type, age, IQ and the presence/absence of comorbid problems as potential moderators of effect sizes.
Twenty-eight effect sizes comparing ID and age matched normal controls on inhibition tasks were included in a random effects meta-regression. Moderators were age, IQ, inhibition type and presence/absence of comorbid disorder.
The analysis showed a medium to large inhibition deficit in ID. Inhibition type significantly moderated effect size, whereas age and comorbid disorder did not. IQ significantly moderated effect size indicating increasing effect size with decreasing IQ, but only in studies that included a sample of ID participants with mean IQ > 70. The analysis indicated comparable deficits in behavioural inhibition and interference control, but no significant deficits in cognitive inhibition and motivational inhibition.
These results indicate that ID is characterised by a medium to large inhibition deficit in individuals with ID. ID seems not to be characterised by deficits in cognitive and motivational inhibition, which might indicate that distinct processes underlie distinct inhibition capacities.
智力障碍(ID)个体的特点是抑制缺陷;然而,这些缺陷的程度仍存在争议。因此,这项荟萃分析有两个目的:一是评估 ID 个体抑制缺陷的程度,二是研究抑制类型、年龄、智商和是否存在合并症作为潜在的效应量调节因素。
28 个比较 ID 和年龄匹配的正常对照组在抑制任务上的效应量被纳入随机效应元回归分析。调节因素包括年龄、智商、抑制类型和是否存在合并症。
分析显示 ID 个体存在中等到较大的抑制缺陷。抑制类型显著调节效应量,而年龄和合并症则没有。智商显著调节效应量,表明随着智商的降低,效应量增加,但仅在包括平均智商>70 的 ID 参与者样本的研究中。分析表明在行为抑制和干扰控制方面存在相当的缺陷,但在认知抑制和动机抑制方面没有显著缺陷。
这些结果表明 ID 个体存在中等到较大的抑制缺陷。ID 似乎没有认知和动机抑制缺陷,这可能表明不同的抑制能力由不同的过程引起。