Department of Social Dentistry/Psychology Applied to Dentistry, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba Dental School (FOP), Av. Limeira, 901-Bairro Areião, CEP: 13414-903, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
BMC Oral Health. 2013 Jul 31;13:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-35.
Studies emphasizing toothache in adulthood are scarce in Brazil. A greater understanding of both the prevalence and the self-perception of pain among individuals in this age group (35 to 44 years old) is important, especially considering that this is an economically active population. To describe reports of oral pain and oral pain-related aspects in from Brazilian state capitals and interior cities.
The sample comprised 9779 adults residing in the state capitals and interior cities from each Brazilian region in the SB Brazil 2010 report, regarding reports of oral pain and their intensity in the last 6 months. The descriptive analysis comparing pain reports between and within the regions and regression analysis of pain related to socioeconomic aspects per region were performed considering α=0.05 difference.
The highest prevalence of pain was found in the Southeast region (p<0.01), and there was also difference between the state capitals and interior cities in the South (p<0.01), where the prevalence was higher in the capitals, and in the Southeast, where the higher prevalence was in the interior cities (p=0.03). The Northern region had lower pain intensity than the Southeast and Midwest. Comparing pain intensity, only the Northeast region showed statistical difference between state capitals and the interior cities for pain intensity, where the interior cities had higher pain intensity than the three state capitals. Regarding dental office visitations, the Southeast capitals have the highest prevalence (100%) compared to the North and South. The toothache impact on daily activities was as follows: eating difficulty (29.8% to 72.7%), uncomfortable teeth brushing (over 50%), and sleep disturbance (above 13%). Between the Brazilian regions the socioeconomic aspects differ in relation to the pain; the exception being the association between pain, dental care and income, which occurred in the 5 regions. Users of public dental care services were more likely to present pain, comparing to private dental services, OR ranging from 1.72 in the Northeast to 2.85 in the Southeast.
The prevalence of pain was higher among Brazilian adults, impacting some of the daily activities. The data also showed many differences in the prevalence and intensity of pain among both the Brazilian regions and the cities within the same region.
在巴西,强调成年人牙痛的研究很少。了解这一年龄组(35 至 44 岁)的流行程度和个人对疼痛的自我认知非常重要,尤其是因为这是一个经济活跃的人群。描述来自巴西各州首府和内地城市的口腔疼痛报告和与疼痛相关的方面。
样本包括来自巴西 SB Brazil 2010 报告中每个地区的州首府和内地城市的 9779 名成年人,报告了过去 6 个月的口腔疼痛及其强度。对各地区之间和内部的疼痛报告进行描述性分析,并对各地区与社会经济方面相关的疼痛进行回归分析,差异显著性水平为α=0.05。
东南部地区的疼痛发生率最高(p<0.01),南部地区的州首府和内地城市之间也存在差异(p<0.01),首府的发生率较高,东南部地区的发生率较高在内地城市(p=0.03)。北部地区的疼痛强度低于东南部和中西部地区。比较疼痛强度,只有东北地区的州首府和内地城市之间的疼痛强度存在统计学差异,内地城市的疼痛强度高于三个州首府。关于牙科就诊,东南部首府的就诊率最高(100%),其次是北部和南部。牙痛对日常活动的影响如下:进食困难(29.8%至 72.7%)、刷牙不舒服(超过 50%)和睡眠障碍(超过 13%)。在巴西各地区,社会经济方面与疼痛有关存在差异;例外是疼痛、口腔护理和收入之间的关联,这种关联存在于 5 个地区。与私人牙科服务相比,使用公共牙科保健服务的人更有可能出现疼痛,OR 从东北部的 1.72 到东南部的 2.85 不等。
巴西成年人的疼痛发生率较高,影响了一些日常活动。数据还显示,巴西各地区以及同一地区的城市之间,疼痛的发生率和强度存在许多差异。