Gallo Maria F, Nanda Kavita, Grimes David A, Lopez Laureen M, Schulz Kenneth F
Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University, Room 324 Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 43210-1351.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 1;2013(8):CD003989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003989.pub5.
Concern about estrogen-related adverse effects has led to progressive reductions in the estrogen dose in combination oral contraceptives (COCs). However, reducing the amount of estrogen to improve safety could result in decreased contraceptive effectiveness and unacceptable changes in bleeding patterns.
To test the hypothesis that COCs containing ≤ 20 μg ethinyl estradiol (EE) perform similarly as those containing > 20 μg in terms of contraceptive effectiveness, bleeding patterns, discontinuation, and side effects.
In July 2013, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and POPLINE, and examined references of potentially eligible trials. We also searched for recent clinical trials using ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. No new trials met the inclusion criteria. Previous searches included EMBASE. For the initial review, we wrote to oral contraceptive manufacturers to identify trials.
English-language reports of randomized controlled trials were eligible that compare a COC containing ≤ 20 μg EE with a COC containing > 20 μg EE. We excluded studies where the interventions were designed to be administered for less than three consecutive cycles or to be used primarily as treatment for non-contraceptive conditions. Trials had to report on contraceptive effectiveness, bleeding patterns, trial discontinuation due to bleeding-related reasons or other side effects, or side effects to be included in the review.
One author evaluated all titles and abstracts from literature searches to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. Two authors independently extracted data from studies identified for inclusion. We wrote to the researchers when additional information was needed. Data were entered and analyzed with RevMan.
No differences were found in contraceptive effectiveness for the 13 COC pairs for which this outcome was reported. Compared to the higher-estrogen pills, several COCs containing 20 μg EE resulted in higher rates of early trial discontinuation (overall and due to adverse events such as irregular bleeding) as well as increased risk of bleeding disturbances (both amenorrhea or infrequent bleeding and irregular, prolonged, frequent bleeding, or breakthrough bleeding or spotting).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: While COCs containing 20 μg EE may be theoretically safer, this review did not focus on the rare events required to assess this hypothesis. Data from existing randomized controlled trials are inadequate to detect possible differences in contraceptive effectiveness. Low-dose estrogen COCs resulted in higher rates of bleeding pattern disruptions. However, most trials compared COCs containing different progestin types, and changes in bleeding patterns could be related to progestin type as well as estrogen dose. Higher follow-up rates are essential for meaningful interpretation of results.
对雌激素相关不良反应的担忧导致复方口服避孕药(COC)中雌激素剂量逐渐降低。然而,降低雌激素剂量以提高安全性可能会导致避孕效果下降以及出血模式出现不可接受的变化。
检验以下假设:含≤20μg炔雌醇(EE)的COC在避孕效果、出血模式、停药情况及副作用方面与含>20μg EE的COC表现相似。
2013年7月,我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库和人口与计划生育数据库,并查阅了潜在合格试验的参考文献。我们还通过美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册库和国际临床试验注册平台检索了近期的临床试验。没有新的试验符合纳入标准。之前的检索包括Embase数据库。对于初步综述,我们写信给口服避孕药制造商以确定试验。
符合条件的为随机对照试验的英文报告,其比较含≤20μg EE的COC与含>20μg EE的COC。我们排除了那些干预措施设计为连续服用少于三个周期或主要用于非避孕疾病治疗的研究。试验必须报告避孕效果、出血模式、因出血相关原因或其他副作用导致的试验停药情况,或纳入综述的副作用。
一位作者评估了文献检索中的所有标题和摘要,以确定它们是否符合纳入标准。两位作者独立从确定纳入的研究中提取数据。当需要更多信息时,我们写信给研究人员。数据使用RevMan软件录入和分析。
对于报告了该结果的13对COC,在避孕效果方面未发现差异。与高雌激素药丸相比,几种含20μg EE的COC导致试验早期停药率更高(总体以及因不规则出血等不良事件),并且出血紊乱风险增加(包括闭经或出血不频繁以及不规则、延长、频繁出血或突破性出血或点滴出血)。
虽然含20μg EE的COC理论上可能更安全,但本综述未关注评估该假设所需的罕见事件。现有随机对照试验的数据不足以检测避孕效果方面可能存在的差异。低剂量雌激素COC导致出血模式紊乱率更高。然而,大多数试验比较的是含不同孕激素类型的COC,出血模式的变化可能与孕激素类型以及雌激素剂量有关。更高的随访率对于有意义地解释结果至关重要。