Screening for aminoglycoside auditory toxicity in the old.

1. We have investigated 22 patients receiving gentamicin, mean (s.d.) age 78 (6) years for auditory toxicity, using a standard audiometric technique in a sound-treated room (Study 1). 2. Use of a portable audiometer might allow a larger and more representative proportion of patients treated with aminoglycosides to be screened for ototoxicity. A method for detecting high frequency loss suitable for use in the ward was evaluated in 12 volunteers aged 27 (4) years (Study 2). 3. The error inherent in taking hearing at the start of treatment as a reference point was measured in 16 patients, aged 81 (8) years, prescribed non-ototoxic antibacterials (Study 3). 4. A significant (P = 0.05) reduction in hearing threshold was detected in Study 1, although psychometric tests revealed unchanged or improved ability to co-operate. This occurred only at 4000 Hz, the highest frequency used. The magnitude of this loss, mean 2.5 dB, was similar to that of the improvement in threshold detected (P = 0.0004) early in the course of treatment in Study 3. Thus, underestimation of ototoxicity is likely. 5. If a change of threshold of 10 dB or more is taken arbitrarily to represent a real change in hearing, then there was a significant excess of patients in Study 1 with losses at 4000 Hz only (P = 0.032). The six with such losses at this frequency were older than the rest. However, there was a significant (P less than 0.02) positive correlation between log mean predose serum gentamicin concentration and age. Thus, it remains to be determined whether presbyacusis sensitizes those hair cells which it does not destroy to toxic damage. 6. The cumulative dose of gentamicin (for a course of the duration given) was calculated according to published prescribing aids. There was no systematic reduction in the ratio of the dose recommended by a given aid to the dose prescribed in the six with hearing losses as defined above. 7. In Study 2, thresholds obtained at 6000 Hz in the open ward were, on average, 0.9 dB higher than in the sound treated room, but the effect of venue did not reach statistical significance. In the morning thresholds were marginally, but significantly (P = 0.04), lower than in the afternoon. Precision, as measured by the standard deviation of replicate determination, was independent of test conditions. Using multiple (ten) threshold determinations appeared to improve resolution.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)