• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用森海塞尔HDA 200耳机的高频(8至16千赫)参考阈值以及相对于耳毒性标准的受试者内阈值变异性。

High-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject threshold variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone.

作者信息

Frank T

机构信息

Department of Communication Disorders, Penn State University, University Park 16802, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2001 Apr;22(2):161-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200104000-00009.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-200104000-00009
PMID:11324845
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The first purpose of this study was to determine high-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) thresholds for standardizing reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (RETSPLs) for a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone. The second and perhaps more important purpose of this study was to determine whether repeated high-frequency thresholds using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone had a lower intrasubject threshold variability than the ASHA 1994 significant threshold shift criteria for ototoxicity.

DESIGN

High-frequency thresholds (8 to 16 kHz) were obtained for 100 (50 male, 50 female) normally hearing (0.25 to 8 kHz) young adults (mean age of 21.2 yr) in four separate test sessions using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone.

RESULTS

The mean and median high-frequency thresholds were similar for each test session and increased as frequency increased. At each frequency, the high-frequency thresholds were not significantly (p > 0.05) different for gender, test ear, or test session. The median thresholds at each frequency were similar to the 1998 interim ISO RETSPLs; however, large standard deviations and wide threshold distributions indicated very high intersubject threshold variability, especially at 14 and 16 kHz. Threshold repeatability was determined by finding the threshold differences between each possible test session comparison (N = 6). About 98% of all of the threshold differences were within a clinically acceptable range of +/-10 dB from 8 to 14 kHz. The threshold differences between each subject's second, third, and fourth minus their first test session were also found to determine whether intrasubject threshold variability was less than the ASHA 1994 criteria for determining a significant threshold shift due to ototoxicity. The results indicated a false-positive rate of 0% for a threshold shift > or = 20 dB at any frequency and a false-positive rate of 2% for a threshold shift >10 dB at two consecutive frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study verified that the output of high-frequency audiometers at 0 dB HL using Sennheiser HDA 200 earphones should equal the 1998 interim ISO RETSPLs from 8 to 16 kHz. Further, because the differences between repeated thresholds were well within +/-10 dB and had an extremely low false-positive rate in reference to the ASHA 1994 criteria for a significant threshold shift due to ototoxicity, a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone can be used for serial monitoring to determine whether significant high-frequency threshold shifts have occurred for patients receiving potentially ototoxic drug therapy.

摘要

目的

本研究的首要目的是确定森海塞尔HDA 200耳机的高频(8至16千赫)阈值,以标准化参考等效阈值声压级(RETSPLs)。本研究的第二个或许更重要的目的是确定使用森海塞尔HDA 200耳机重复测量高频阈值时,受试者内部阈值变异性是否低于美国言语语言听力协会(ASHA)1994年规定的耳毒性显著阈值变化标准。

设计

使用森海塞尔HDA 200耳机,在四个独立的测试环节中,对100名(50名男性,50名女性)听力正常(0.25至8千赫)的年轻成年人(平均年龄21.2岁)进行高频(8至16千赫)阈值测量。

结果

每个测试环节的高频阈值均值和中位数相似,且随频率增加而升高。在每个频率上,高频阈值在性别、测试耳或测试环节方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。每个频率的中位数阈值与1998年ISO临时RETSPLs相似;然而,较大的标准差和较宽的阈值分布表明受试者间阈值变异性非常高,尤其是在14和16千赫时。通过找出每个可能的测试环节比较之间的阈值差异(N = 6)来确定阈值重复性。在8至14千赫范围内,约98%的阈值差异在临床上可接受的±10分贝范围内。还通过比较每个受试者第二次、第三次和第四次测试环节减去第一次测试环节的阈值差异,来确定受试者内部阈值变异性是否小于ASHA 1994年规定的因耳毒性导致显著阈值变化的标准。结果表明,在任何频率下阈值变化≥20分贝时假阳性率为0%,在两个连续频率下阈值变化>10分贝时假阳性率为2%。

结论

本研究证实,使用森海塞尔HDA 200耳机时,0分贝听力级下高频听力计的输出应与1998年ISO临时RETSPLs在8至16千赫范围内相等。此外,由于重复阈值之间的差异远在±10分贝以内,且相对于ASHA 1994年规定的因耳毒性导致显著阈值变化的标准,假阳性率极低,因此森海塞尔HDA 200耳机可用于连续监测,以确定接受潜在耳毒性药物治疗的患者是否发生了显著的高频阈值变化。

相似文献

1
High-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject threshold variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone.使用森海塞尔HDA 200耳机的高频(8至16千赫)参考阈值以及相对于耳毒性标准的受试者内阈值变异性。
Ear Hear. 2001 Apr;22(2):161-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200104000-00009.
2
Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.两种环式耳机在测听中的评估。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jan/Feb;40(1):177-183. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000585.
3
Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones.使用森海塞尔HDA 200耳机和音特美ER-2耳机测试0.5至16千赫兹纯音听阈的重测信度。
Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):127-32. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000120361.87401.c8.
4
Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone and Etymotic Research ER-2 insert earphone in the frequency range 125 Hz to 16 kHz.森海塞尔HDA 200耳机和音特美ER-2入耳式耳机在125赫兹至16千赫兹频率范围内的等效阈值声压级。
Scand Audiol. 1998;27(2):105-12. doi: 10.1080/010503998420342.
5
Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.固定水平频率阈值测试用于耳毒性监测。
Ear Hear. 2017 Nov/Dec;38(6):e369-e375. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000433.
6
High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.儿童高频纯音测听:与耳毒性标准相关的测试-重测信度研究。
Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):104-11. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228a77d.
7
Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.扩展高频智能手机听力测定法:有效性与可靠性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Mar;30(3):217-226. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17111. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
8
Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5.扩展高频听力测定中的耳机与ISO 389-5。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Sep;53(9):595-603. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.903339. Epub 2014 May 5.
9
Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.纯音测听与正向声压级校准相结合可显著提高测试-重测信度的临床相关性。
Ear Hear. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):946-957. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000555.
10
Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.影响畸变产物耳声发射对耳毒性听力损失敏感性的因素。
Ear Hear. 2008 Dec;29(6):875-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318181ad99.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and audiometric thresholds in the extended high-frequency range.扩展高频范围内畸变产物耳声发射与听阈之间的关系。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2025 Mar 1;157(3):1889-1898. doi: 10.1121/10.0036143.
2
The relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and audiometric thresholds in the extended high-frequency range.扩展高频范围内畸变产物耳声发射与听力阈值之间的关系。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jul 10:2024.07.05.601801. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.05.601801.
3
Evaluation of a Fast Method to Measure High-Frequency Audiometry Based on Bayesian Learning.
基于贝叶斯学习的高频测听快速测量方法评估。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165231225545. doi: 10.1177/23312165231225545.
4
Effects of Stimulus Type on 16-kHz Detection Thresholds.刺激类型对 16kHz 检测阈值的影响。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(2):486-498. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001446. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
5
The audiogram: Detection of pure-tone stimuli in ototoxicity monitoring and assessments of investigational medicines for the inner ear.听力图:耳毒性监测中的纯音刺激检测以及内耳研究药物的评估。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jul;152(1):470. doi: 10.1121/10.0011739.
6
Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System.无线自动听力测试系统的参考等效阈声压级。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jul;152(1):601. doi: 10.1121/10.0012733.
7
Methods for the calibration of bone conduction transducers at frequencies from 5 to 20 kHz.5至20千赫兹频率下骨传导换能器的校准方法。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 May;151(5):2945. doi: 10.1121/10.0010381.
8
Extended high frequency hearing and speech perception implications in adults and children.成人和儿童扩展高频听力和言语感知的意义。
Hear Res. 2020 Nov;397:107922. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107922. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
9
A Review of Cisplatin-Associated Ototoxicity.顺铂相关耳毒性综述
Semin Hear. 2019 May;40(2):108-121. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1684041. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
10
Drug-Induced Ototoxicity: Diagnosis and Monitoring.药物性耳毒性:诊断与监测。
Drug Saf. 2018 May;41(5):451-464. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0629-8.