Suppr超能文献

托珠单抗皮下注射与静脉注射联合传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗中重度类风湿关节炎的安全性和有效性的随机、双盲、平行分组研究(SUMMACTA 研究)。

A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study).

机构信息

Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Free University and Humboldt University of Berlin, , Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):69-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203523. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) formulations of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD).

METHODS

Patients (n=1262) were randomly assigned to receive tocilizumab-SC 162 mg weekly+placebo-IV every 4 weeks or tocilizumab-IV 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks+placebo-SC weekly in combination with traditional DMARD. The primary outcome was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of tocilizumab-SC to tocilizumab-IV with regard to the proportion of patients in each group achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 24 using a 12% non-inferiority margin (NIM). Secondary outcomes were disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28), ACR responses, health assessment questionnaire scores and safety assessments.

RESULTS

At week 24, 69.4% (95% CI 65.5 to 73.2) of tocilizumab-SC-treated patients versus 73.4% (95% CI 69.6 to 77.1) of tocilizumab-IV-treated patients achieved an ACR20 response (weighted difference between groups -4.0%, 95% CI -9.2 to 1.2); the 12% NIM was met. ACR50/70 responses, DAS28 and physical function improvements were comparable between the tocilizumab-SC and tocilizumab-IV groups. The safety profiles of tocilizumab-SC and tocilizumab-IV were similar, and the most common adverse event was infection. Injection-site reactions (ISR) occurred more frequently in the tocilizumab-SC group than in the tocilizumab-IV (placebo-SC) group. No anaphylaxis was reported over the 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Tocilizumab-SC 162 mg weekly demonstrated comparable efficacy to tocilizumab-IV 8 mg/kg. The safety profile of tocilizumab-SC is consistent with the known and well-established safety profile of tocilizumab-IV, with the exception of a higher incidence of ISR, which were more common with tocilizumab-SC administration.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了皮下(SC)和静脉(IV)两种托珠单抗制剂在接受改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗后应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

将 1262 名患者随机分为托珠单抗-SC 162mg 每周+安慰剂-IV 每 4 周一次组,或托珠单抗-IV 8mg/kg 每 4 周一次+安慰剂-SC 每周一次组,联合使用传统 DMARD。主要终点是证明托珠单抗-SC 在达到美国风湿病学会(ACR)20 应答的患者比例方面不劣于托珠单抗-IV,采用 12%的非劣效性边界(NIM)。次要终点是 28 个关节疾病活动度评分(DAS28)、ACR 应答、健康评估问卷评分和安全性评估。

结果

在第 24 周,托珠单抗-SC 治疗组有 69.4%(95%可信区间 65.5 至 73.2)的患者达到 ACR20 应答,而托珠单抗-IV 治疗组有 73.4%(95%可信区间 69.6 至 77.1)的患者达到 ACR20 应答(两组间加权差异-4.0%,95%可信区间-9.2 至 1.2);满足 12%的 NIM。托珠单抗-SC 组和托珠单抗-IV 组的 ACR50/70 应答、DAS28 和身体功能改善相当。托珠单抗-SC 和托珠单抗-IV 的安全性谱相似,最常见的不良事件是感染。托珠单抗-SC 组比托珠单抗-IV(安慰剂-SC)组更常发生注射部位反应(ISR)。在 24 周内没有报告过敏反应。

结论

托珠单抗-SC 每周 162mg 与托珠单抗-IV 8mg/kg 疗效相当。托珠单抗-SC 的安全性谱与托珠单抗-IV 已知且成熟的安全性谱一致,除了 ISR 的发生率较高外,这在托珠单抗-SC 给药时更为常见。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeea/3888614/b51c56bc9a0d/annrheumdis-2013-203523f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验