• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦诚义务要求给予护士更好的保护。

Duty of candour requires better protection for nurses.

作者信息

Griffith Richard

机构信息

College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2013;22(6):350-1. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.6.350.

DOI:10.12968/bjon.2013.22.6.350
PMID:23905218
Abstract

The report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public inquiry has a statutory duty of candor at its heart and the requirement for openness and transparency running through most of its 290 recommendations. While many will consider such a legal duty essential if a repeat of the Mid Staffordshire scandal is to be avoided, the duty is unlikely to be effective unless nurses can discharge their obligations without fear of recrimination. This article argues that current protection for nurses who report poor practice is inadequate and must be improved if the openness and transparency recommended is to become a reality in the NHS.

摘要

米德斯塔福郡国民保健服务基金会信托基金公共调查的报告核心是法定的坦诚义务,其290条建议中的大部分都贯穿了公开透明的要求。虽然许多人会认为,如果要避免米德斯塔福郡丑闻的重演,这样的法律义务至关重要,但除非护士能够在不担心受到指责的情况下履行其义务,否则这项义务不太可能有效。本文认为,目前对举报不良行为的护士的保护不足,如果国民保健服务体系要实现所建议的公开透明,就必须加以改进。

相似文献

1
Duty of candour requires better protection for nurses.坦诚义务要求给予护士更好的保护。
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(6):350-1. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.6.350.
2
Culture, compassion and clinical neglect: probity in the NHS after Mid Staffordshire.文化、同情心与临床疏忽:米德斯塔福郡事件后的英国国民医疗服务体系中的正直问题
J Med Ethics. 2015 Dec;41(12):956-62. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101048. Epub 2013 May 23.
3
Understanding the Code: the duty of candour.理解准则:坦诚义务。
Br J Community Nurs. 2015 Aug;20(8):407-9. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.8.407.
4
Better protection for nursing: reporting poor practice.加强对护理工作的保护:举报不良行为。
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(14):842-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.14.842.
5
Adhering to new duty of candour guidance.
Nurs Times. 2015;111(32-33):17-9.
6
Is legislation protecting nurses who blow the whistle?是否有立法保护举报的护士?
Nurs Times. 2002;98(46):10-11.
7
The duty of candour: what it means for practising nurses.坦诚的职责:对执业护士意味着什么。
Br J Nurs. 2015;24(21):1102-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.21.1102.
8
The future for Medico-Legal disputes - a patient perspective.医疗法律纠纷的未来——患者视角
Med Leg J. 2014 Mar;82(1):18-28. doi: 10.1177/0025817213511395.
9
Government should not take "big stick" to NHS after Mid Staffs report, says think tank.智库称,政府在米德斯塔福郡报告后不应拿“大棒”对付国民医疗服务体系。
BMJ. 2013 Mar 15;346:f1722. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1722.
10
Does the whistleblowing law protect me?
Ohio Nurses Rev. 2002 Aug;77(7):16.

引用本文的文献

1
Significance of incident reports by medical doctors for organizational transparency and driving forces for patient safety.医生事件报告对组织透明度的意义及患者安全的驱动因素。
Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Apr 16;14:13. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00240-y. eCollection 2020.
2
Effectiveness and limitations of an incident-reporting system analyzed by local clinical safety leaders in a tertiary hospital: Prospective evaluation through real-time observations of patient safety incidents.一家三级医院的当地临床安全负责人对事件报告系统的有效性和局限性进行分析:通过对患者安全事件的实时观察进行前瞻性评估。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(38):e12509. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012509.