• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宰后浸水冷鲜鸡微生物采样方法的评估

Evaluation of three sampling methods for the microbiological analysis of broiler carcasses after immersion chilling.

机构信息

Laboratório de Bioquímica de Alimentos-LbqA, Faculdade de Farmácia, UFMG, Avenida Antonio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brasil.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2013 Aug;76(8):1330-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-004.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-004
PMID:23905787
Abstract

Countries have different official programs and implement different sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella on poultry carcasses. In Brazil, a 25-g sample of skin and muscle excision (SME) from the wings, neck, and pericloacal parts is used; in the European Union (EU), a 25-g sample of neck skin (NSE) is used; and, in the United States, the whole carcass is rinsed with 400 ml of diluent (WCR). In the present study, these methods were evaluated to compare Salmonella occurrence and counts of hygiene indicator microorganisms (Escherichia coli, Enterobacteriaceae, and total viable count of aerobic mesophilic bacteria) using different carcasses from the same flock and also using different analytical units taken from the same carcass. Eighty flocks, with four broiler carcasses from each, were included in this study; three broilers were sampled according to protocols from Brazil, the EU, and the United States, and the last one by all three methods. SME, NSE, and WCR provided equivalent results (P > 0.05) for Salmonella detection on broiler carcasses when using different carcasses from the same flock and when using the same carcass. The predominant serovar was Salmonella Enteritidis. For the enumeration of hygiene indicator microorganisms, WRC provided higher counts than SME or NSE (P < 0.05), when using both the same or different carcasses. Therefore, it is possible to directly compare Salmonella results in poultry carcasses when using the methods recommended by the legislative bodies of Brazil, the United States, and the EU. However, WCR provides the best results for hygiene indicator microorganisms.

摘要

不同国家针对禽肉沙门氏菌检测有不同的官方方案和采样方法。在巴西,采用 25 克翅、颈和肛周部位的皮肤和肌肉切除物(SME)样本;在欧盟,采用 25 克颈部皮肤样本(NSE);而在美国,整个屠体用 400 毫升稀释液冲洗(WCR)。本研究评估了这些方法,比较了同一批禽肉不同样本中沙门氏菌的发生情况和卫生指示微生物(大肠杆菌、肠杆菌科和需氧嗜温细菌总数)的计数,同时还比较了同一屠体不同分析单位的结果。本研究共纳入 80 个鸡群,每个鸡群有 4 只肉鸡屠体;根据巴西、欧盟和美国的方案,对 3 只肉鸡进行了采样,第 4 只肉鸡则采用了所有三种方法。对于同一批禽肉不同样本和同一屠体的沙门氏菌检测,SME、NSE 和 WCR 提供了等效的结果(P>0.05)。优势血清型为肠炎沙门氏菌。对于卫生指示微生物的计数,WRC 提供的结果高于 SME 或 NSE(P<0.05),无论是同一批还是不同批禽肉均如此。因此,当使用巴西、美国和欧盟立法机构推荐的方法时,可直接比较禽肉中沙门氏菌的结果。然而,WCR 最适合卫生指示微生物的检测。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of three sampling methods for the microbiological analysis of broiler carcasses after immersion chilling.宰后浸水冷鲜鸡微生物采样方法的评估
J Food Prot. 2013 Aug;76(8):1330-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-004.
2
Comparison of neck skin excision and whole carcass rinse sampling methods for microbiological evaluation of broiler carcasses before and after immersion chilling.宰前和宰后浸烫冷却鸡只胴体微生物评估中颈皮切除与全胴体冲洗采样方法的比较。
J Food Prot. 2010 May;73(5):976-80. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.5.976.
3
Prevalence and Serogroup Diversity of Salmonella for Broiler Neck Skin, Whole Carcass Rinse, and Whole Carcass Enrichment Sampling Methodologies following Air or Immersion Chilling.空气冷却或沉浸式冷却后肉鸡颈部皮肤、整鸡冲洗和整鸡富集采样方法中沙门氏菌的流行率和血清群多样性
J Food Prot. 2015 Nov;78(11):1938-44. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-189.
4
Hygiene indicator microorganisms for selected pathogens on beef, pork, and poultry meats in Belgium.比利时牛肉、猪肉和禽肉上选定病原体的卫生指示微生物。
J Food Prot. 2008 Jan;71(1):35-45. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.1.35.
5
Sampling naturally contaminated broiler carcasses for Salmonella by three different methods.采用三种不同方法对受污染的肉鸡胴体进行沙门氏菌抽样。
J Food Prot. 2014 Mar;77(3):493-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-320.
6
Effect of prechill fecal contamination on numbers of bacteria recovered from broiler chicken carcasses before and after immersion chilling.预冷粪便污染对肉仔鸡屠体在浸水冷却前后回收的细菌数量的影响。
J Food Prot. 2004 Sep;67(9):1829-33. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.9.1829.
7
Recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses rinsed zero and twenty-four hours after immersion chilling.从浸水冷却是零小时和二十四小时后冲洗的肉鸡胴体中回收细菌。
Poult Sci. 2006 Feb;85(2):333-6. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.2.333.
8
Recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses after immersion chilling in different volumes of water, part 2.在不同水量中浸泡冷却后从肉鸡胴体中回收细菌,第2部分。
Poult Sci. 2008 Mar;87(3):573-6. doi: 10.3382/ps.2006-00444.
9
Effect of dry air or immersion chilling on recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses.干燥空气或浸泡冷却对肉鸡胴体细菌回收率的影响。
J Food Prot. 2007 Aug;70(8):1829-34. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.8.1829.
10
Comparison of destructive and nondestructive sampling techniques of retail chicken carcasses for enumeration of hygiene indicator microorganisms.零售鸡胴体卫生指示微生物计数的破坏性和非破坏性采样技术比较。
J Food Prot. 2012 Jan;75(1):29-33. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-247.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of Isolates Recovered from Stages of the Processing Lines at Four Broiler Processing Plants in Trinidad and Tobago.对从特立尼达和多巴哥四个肉鸡加工厂生产线各阶段分离出的菌株的特性分析。
Microorganisms. 2021 May 13;9(5):1048. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051048.
2
Prevalence and serotypes of Salmonella spp. on chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad.特立尼达零售点销售的鸡中沙门氏菌属的流行情况和血清型。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202108. eCollection 2018.