Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug;35(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.FOCUS12398.
Clinical results for unilateral pedicle screw fixation after lumbar interbody fusion have been reported to be as good as those for bilateral instrumentation. However, no studies have directly compared unilateral and bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The purpose of this study was to determine whether unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is comparable with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in 1-segment MIS TLIF.
This was a prospective randomized study of 53 patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation after MIS TLIF for 1-segment lumbar degenerative disc disease. Twenty-six patients were assigned to a unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group and 27 patients were assigned to a bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group. Operative time, blood loss, clinical outcomes (that is, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] and visual analog scale [VAS] scores), complication rates, and fusion rates were assessed using CT scanning 2 years after surgical treatment.
The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and operated level, and they did not differ significantly in the length of follow-up (27.5 [Group 1] vs 28.9 [Group 2] months) or clinical results. Both groups showed substantial improvements in VAS and ODI scores 2 years after surgical treatment. The groups differed significantly in operative time (unilateral 84.2 minutes; bilateral 137.6 minutes), blood loss (unilateral 92.7 ml; bilateral, 232.0 ml), fusion rate (unilateral 84.6%; bilateral 96.3%), and postoperative scoliotic change (unilateral 23.1%; bilateral 3.7%).
Unilateral and bilateral screw fixation after MIS TLIF produced similar clinical results. Although perioperative results were better with unilateral screw fixation, the long-term results were better with bilateral screw fixation, suggesting bilateral screw fixation is a better choice after MIS TLIF.
单侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定在腰椎椎间融合术后的临床效果与双侧内固定相当。然而,尚无研究直接比较微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)后路单侧与双侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定。本研究旨在确定单侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定在 1 节段微创 TLIF 中是否与双侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定相当。
这是一项前瞻性随机研究,纳入了 53 例因 1 节段腰椎退变性椎间盘疾病行单侧或双侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定微创 TLIF 的患者。26 例患者被分配到单侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定组,27 例患者被分配到双侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定组。术后 2 年通过 CT 扫描评估手术时间、出血量、临床结果(即 Oswestry 功能障碍指数[ODI]和视觉模拟量表[VAS]评分)、并发症发生率和融合率。
2 组患者的年龄、性别、术前诊断和手术节段均相似,且随访时间(单侧组为 27.5 个月,双侧组为 28.9 个月)和临床结果无显著差异。术后 2 年,2 组 VAS 和 ODI 评分均显著改善。2 组在手术时间(单侧 84.2 分钟;双侧 137.6 分钟)、出血量(单侧 92.7ml;双侧 232.0ml)、融合率(单侧 84.6%;双侧 96.3%)和术后脊柱侧凸变化(单侧 23.1%;双侧 3.7%)方面存在显著差异。
微创 TLIF 后路单侧和双侧螺钉固定均产生相似的临床效果。虽然单侧螺钉固定的围手术期结果更好,但双侧螺钉固定的长期结果更好,提示微创 TLIF 后路双侧螺钉固定是更好的选择。