University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG8 1BB, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
Recent reforms, which change incentive and accountability structures in the English National Health Service, can be conceptualised as trying to shift the dominant institutional logic in the field of primary medical care (general medical practice) away from medical professionalism towards a logic of "population based medicine". This paper draws on interviews with primary care doctors, conducted during 2007-2009 and 2011-2012. It contrasts the approach of active management of populations, in line with recent reforms with responses to patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Our data suggest that rather than one logic becoming dominant, different dimensions of organisational activity reflect different logics. Although some aspects of organisational life are relatively untouched by the reforms, this is not due to 'resistance' on the part of staff within these organisations to attempts to 'control' them. We suggest that a more helpful way of understanding the data is to see these different aspects of work as governed by different institutional logics.
最近的改革改变了英国国家医疗服务体系的激励和问责结构,可以被概念化为试图将初级医疗保健(全科医疗实践)领域的主导制度逻辑从医学专业主义转向“基于人群的医学”逻辑。本文借鉴了 2007-2009 年和 2011-2012 年期间对初级保健医生进行的访谈。它对比了与最近的改革相一致的人群积极管理方法与对具有医学无法解释症状的患者的反应。我们的数据表明,不同维度的组织活动反映了不同的逻辑,而不是一种逻辑占据主导地位。尽管组织生活的某些方面相对不受改革的影响,但这并不是因为这些组织内的工作人员对试图“控制”他们的做法有“抵触”。我们认为,理解这些数据的一个更有用的方法是,将工作的这些不同方面视为由不同的制度逻辑所支配。