• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较非对比计算机断层扫描标准与双能 X 射线吸收测定法作为电磁冲击波碎石术后不透射线上尿路结石碎裂的预测指标。

Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.

机构信息

Urology Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2013 Nov;41(6):511-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0596-1. Epub 2013 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-013-0596-1
PMID:23907170
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the value of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in comparison to non contrast computed tomography (NCCT) density as possible predictors of upper urinary tract stone disintegration by shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). This study included 100 consecutive patients, with solitary renal stone 0.5-2 cm or upper ureteral stone up to 1 cm. DXA to calculate stone mineral density (SMD) and stone mineral content (SMC) was done. NCCT was performed to measure Hounsfield units (HU). SWL was performed with an electromagnetic lithotripsy, plain X-ray documented disintegration after SWL. Successful treatment was defined as stone free or complete fragmentation after 1 or 2 sessions of SWL. The impact of patients age, sex, body mass index, stone laterality, location, volume, length, mean SMC and SMD, HU and Hounsfield density (HD), skin to stone distance (SSD) and number of shock waves were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Only 76 patients were available for follow-up. Success of disintegration was observed in 50 out of 76 patients (65.8 %). On multivariate analysis, SMC and number of shock wave were the significant independent factors affecting SWL outcome (p = 0.04 and p = 0.000, respectively). SMC as detected by DXA is a significant predictor of success of stone disintegration by SWL. SMC measured by DXA is more accurate than HU measured by CT. Patients with high stone mineral content (SMC greater than 0.65 g) should be directly offered another treatment option.

摘要

本研究旨在评估双能 X 线吸收仪(DXA)与非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)密度在预测体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗上尿路结石方面的价值。该研究纳入了 100 例连续患者,包括 0.5-2cm 的肾结石或最大直径达 1cm 的输尿管上段结石。通过 DXA 计算结石矿物质密度(SMD)和矿物质含量(SMC)。NCCT 用于测量亨氏单位(HU)。采用电磁碎石机进行 SWL,在 SWL 后进行普通 X 射线检查,以确定结石是否碎裂。成功治疗定义为 1 或 2 次 SWL 后结石无残留或完全碎裂。通过单变量和多变量分析评估了患者年龄、性别、体重指数、结石侧位、位置、体积、长度、平均 SMC 和 SMD、HU 和亨氏密度(HD)、皮肤至结石距离(SSD)和冲击波数量等因素的影响。仅有 76 例患者可进行随访。76 例患者中有 50 例(65.8%)观察到结石碎裂成功。多变量分析显示,SMC 和冲击波数量是影响 SWL 结果的独立因素(p=0.04 和 p=0.000)。DXA 检测到的 SMC 是 SWL 碎石成功的显著预测因子。DXA 测量的 SMC 比 CT 测量的 HU 更准确。高结石矿物质含量(SMC 大于 0.65g)的患者应直接提供另一种治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.比较非对比计算机断层扫描标准与双能 X 射线吸收测定法作为电磁冲击波碎石术后不透射线上尿路结石碎裂的预测指标。
Urolithiasis. 2013 Nov;41(6):511-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0596-1. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
2
A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography.体外冲击波碎石术预测结石碎裂相关因素的前瞻性多变量分析:高分辨率非增强计算机断层扫描的价值
Eur Urol. 2007 Jun;51(6):1688-93; discussion 1693-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.048. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
3
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.高分辨率CT参数预测上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的前瞻性评估
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
4
Prediction of fragility of urinary calculi by dual X-ray absorptiometry.采用双能X线吸收法预测尿路结石的易碎性。
J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1097-100. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000086092.38214.24.
5
Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.通过计算机断层扫描上的皮肤到结石距离确定冲击波碎石术的成功率。
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):941-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.011.
6
Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.CT-Calculometry(CT-CM)的高级非对比计算机断层扫描后处理优于已建立的冲击波碎石术结果预测指标。
World J Urol. 2018 Dec;36(12):2073-2080. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2348-x. Epub 2018 May 29.
7
Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石疾病后,通过计算机断层扫描结果评估成功预测情况。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Jan;47(1):69-73. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0857-0. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
8
Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.评估平均结石密度和皮肤至结石距离在预测肾和输尿管结石冲击波碎石术成功率中的重要性。
Urol Res. 2010 Aug;38(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
9
The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.腹部脂肪参数和结石密度对体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的预测作用。
Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2020;16(1):80-87. doi: 10.2174/1573405614666180927112127.
10
How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?计算机断层扫描中的结石衰减和皮肤到结石的距离如何影响输尿管结石病中冲击波碎石术的疗效?
BMC Urol. 2015 Jul 23;15:72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0069-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating shear wave elastography as a predictor of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes in children.评估剪切波弹性成像作为儿童体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果预测指标的价值。
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jun 25;53(1):126. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01796-z.
2
Can shear wave elastography predict the success of shock‑wave lithotripsy used in renal stones treatment? A prospective study.剪切波弹性成像能否预测冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效?一项前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 15;42(1):160. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04855-z.
3
Do Hounsfield Units have any significance in predicting intra- and postoperative outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery using Holmium and Thulium fiber laser? Results from the FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR).

本文引用的文献

1
Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.通过计算机断层扫描上的皮肤到结石距离确定冲击波碎石术的成功率。
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):941-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.011.
2
Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi.无造影剂增强计算机断层扫描在预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石疗效中的作用
BJU Int. 2005 Jun;95(9):1285-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05520.x.
3
Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi.
钬激光和铥光纤激光逆行肾内手术中亨氏单位对预测围手术期结局是否有意义?来自 Flex 输尿管镜手术结果登记处(FLEXOR)的研究结果。
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):2881-2888. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04362-7. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
4
Analysis of the Application Value of X-Ray Digital Tomographic Fusion Technique in Urinary System Diseases.X 射线数字断层融合技术在泌尿系统疾病中的应用价值分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 7;2022:6294752. doi: 10.1155/2022/6294752. eCollection 2022.
5
Factors influencing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy efficiency for optimal patient selection.影响体外冲击波碎石术效率以实现最佳患者选择的因素。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Jun;16(2):409-416. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.103915. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
6
Usability of shear wave elastography to predict the success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: prospective pilot study.剪切波弹性成像预测体外冲击波碎石术成功的可行性:前瞻性初步研究。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Jun;49(3):255-260. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01221-7. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for high-density moderate-sized renal stones: A prospective randomized study.经皮肾镜取石术与冲击波碎石术治疗高密度中等大小肾结石的前瞻性随机研究
Urol Ann. 2019 Oct-Dec;11(4):426-431. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_63_19.
8
Evaluating the importance of different computed tomography scan-based factors in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones.评估基于计算机断层扫描的不同因素对体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石效果的预测的重要性。
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Jan;59(1):25-31. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.1.25. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
9
Is scoring system of computed tomography based metric parameters can accurately predicts shock wave lithotripsy stone-free rates and aid in the development of treatment strategies?基于计算机断层扫描的度量参数评分系统能否准确预测冲击波碎石术的结石清除率并有助于制定治疗策略?
Urol Ann. 2016 Apr-Jun;8(2):197-202. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.164842.
10
Clinical Nomograms to Predict Stone-Free Rates after Shock-Wave Lithotripsy: Development and Internal-Validation.预测冲击波碎石术后结石清除率的临床列线图:开发与内部验证
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 18;11(2):e0149333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149333. eCollection 2016.
螺旋CT在尿路结石成像中的应用进展。
J Endourol. 2004 Dec;18(10):937-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.937.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units.基于体重指数和亨氏单位的体外冲击波碎石术成功率
Urology. 2005 Jan;65(1):33-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.08.004.
5
Prediction of fragility of urinary calculi by dual X-ray absorptiometry.采用双能X线吸收法预测尿路结石的易碎性。
J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1097-100. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000086092.38214.24.
6
Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.计算机断层扫描上的亨氏单位可预测体外冲击波碎石术后的结石清除率。
J Urol. 2003 May;169(5):1679-81. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000055608.92069.3a.
7
CT and stone fragility.CT与结石易碎性
J Endourol. 2001 Feb;15(1):31-6. doi: 10.1089/08927790150500926.
8
Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic.目前对肾绞痛患者的影像学检查
Eur Radiol. 2001;11(1):4-17. doi: 10.1007/s003300000589.
9
Applications of bone densitometry for osteoporosis.骨密度测定法在骨质疏松症中的应用。
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998 Jun;27(2):267-88. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70005-0.
10
Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography.通过螺旋计算机断层扫描准确测定尿结石的化学成分。
J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):673-5.