Hirotaka Sano, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aobaku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2262-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546513497565. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
There are 2 representative shapes of full-thickness rotator cuff tears commonly observed: crescent-shaped and L-shaped tears. To date, the exact process of tear propagation in each shape remains unknown.
To determine the stress distribution pattern in rotator cuff tendons with a crescent-shaped tear and an L-shaped tear.
Descriptive laboratory study.
The computed tomography (CT) data of a normal cadaveric shoulder from a 69-year-old man were used to develop a 3-dimensional finite element model of the rotator cuff tendons. Three different sizes (1.0-, 2.0-, and 3.0-cm widths) of crescent-shaped and L-shaped tears were created. Tensile load was applied to each cuff tendon that simulated shoulder abduction and external rotation in the hanging-arm position. Elastic analysis was performed, and distribution of the von Mises equivalent stress was calculated. Then, the stress distribution pattern was compared between the 2 tear shapes and among the 3 different tear sizes.
In the crescent-shaped tear models, stress concentration was seen in both the anterior and the posterior edges of the torn tendon stump. In the L-shaped tear models, stress concentration was seen in the posterior torn tendon edge as well as the bottom of the longitudinal tear. The areas with high stress concentration increased with increasing tear size. At the posterior torn tendon edge, a common site of delamination, the articular half represented a higher equivalent stress than the bursal half in all models. The highest equivalent stress increased with an increase in tear size for both the abduction and the external rotation loads.
A high stress concentration was seen in both the anterior and the posterior tendon edge in crescent-shaped tears and in both the posterior tendon edge and the bottom of the longitudinal tear in L-shaped tears. Stress concentration inside the tendon increased with increasing tear size.
Crescent-shaped tears may propagate in the anterior and posterior directions, whereas L-shaped tears may propagate in the posterior and medial directions. Tear propagation may accelerate with an increase in tear size.
全层肩袖撕裂有两种常见的代表性形状:新月形和 L 形撕裂。迄今为止,每种形状撕裂的传播过程尚不清楚。
确定新月形和 L 形肩袖撕裂的肩袖肌腱中的应力分布模式。
描述性实验室研究。
使用一名 69 岁男性正常尸体肩部的计算机断层扫描(CT)数据,开发肩袖肌腱的三维有限元模型。创建了三种不同大小(1.0、2.0 和 3.0 厘米宽)的新月形和 L 形撕裂。对模拟悬垂臂位置下肩部外展和外旋的每个肩袖肌腱施加拉伸载荷。进行弹性分析,并计算 von Mises 等效应力的分布。然后,比较了两种撕裂形状和三种不同撕裂大小之间的应力分布模式。
在新月形撕裂模型中,撕裂肌腱残端的前边缘和后边缘都出现了应力集中。在 L 形撕裂模型中,除了撕裂肌腱的后边缘,还有纵向撕裂的底部,也出现了应力集中。随着撕裂尺寸的增加,高应力集中的区域增加。在撕裂肌腱的后边缘,即分层的常见部位,在所有模型中,关节半部分的等效应力都高于滑囊半部分。对于外展和外旋负荷,随着撕裂尺寸的增加,等效应力的最大值增加。
新月形撕裂在撕裂肌腱的前边缘和后边缘以及 L 形撕裂在撕裂肌腱的后边缘和纵向撕裂的底部都出现了高应力集中。随着撕裂尺寸的增加,肌腱内的应力集中增加。
新月形撕裂可能在前部和后部方向传播,而 L 形撕裂可能在后部和内侧方向传播。随着撕裂尺寸的增加,撕裂的传播可能会加速。