• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

器械辅助脊柱融合术后深部感染的种植体存活率。

Implant survival after deep infection of an instrumented spinal fusion.

机构信息

St. Franziskus Hospital and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spine Surgery, Schönsteinstr 63, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2013 Aug;95-B(8):1121-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.30784.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.30784
PMID:23908430
Abstract

This study evaluates the long-term survival of spinal implants after surgical site infection (SSI) and the risk factors associated with treatment failure. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out on 43 patients who had undergone a posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation between January 2006 and December 2008, and who consecutively developed an acute deep surgical site infection. All were appropriately treated by surgical debridement with a tailored antibiotic program based on culture results for a minimum of eight weeks. A 'terminal event' or failure of treatment was defined as implant removal or death related to the SSI. The mean follow-up was 26 months (1.03 to 50.9). A total of ten patients (23.3%) had a terminal event. The rate of survival after the first debridement was 90.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.95 to 98.24) at six months, 85.4% (95% CI 74.64 to 96.18) at one year, and 73.2% (95% CI 58.70 to 87.78) at two, three and four years. Four of nine patients required re-instrumentation after implant removal, and two of the four had a recurrent infection at the surgical site. There was one recurrence after implant removal without re-instrumentation. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant risk of treatment failure in patients who developed sepsis (hazard ratio (HR) 12.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6 to 59.9); p < 0.001) or who had > three fused segments (HR 4.5 (95% CI 1.25 to 24.05); p = 0.03). Implant survival is seriously compromised even after properly treated surgical site infection, but progressively decreases over the first 24 months.

摘要

本研究评估了脊柱植入物在手术部位感染(SSI)后的长期存活率以及与治疗失败相关的危险因素。对 2006 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月间接受后路脊柱融合内固定术且随后发生急性深部手术部位感染的 43 例患者进行了 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析。所有患者均通过手术清创和基于培养结果的个体化抗生素方案(至少 8 周)得到适当治疗。将植入物移除或与 SSI 相关的死亡定义为“终末事件”或治疗失败。平均随访时间为 26 个月(1.03-50.9)。共有 10 例患者(23.3%)发生终末事件。第一次清创后,生存率为 6 个月时 90.7%(95%置信区间(CI)82.95-98.24),1 年时 85.4%(95% CI 74.64-96.18),2、3、4 年时分别为 73.2%(95% CI 58.70-87.78)。9 例患者中有 4 例在植入物移除后需要重新内固定,其中 4 例中有 2 例在手术部位再次发生感染。有 1 例在移除植入物后没有重新内固定的情况下出现了复发。多变量分析显示,发生脓毒症的患者(风险比(HR)12.5(95%置信区间(CI)2.6-59.9);p<0.001)或融合节段>3 个的患者(HR 4.5(95% CI 1.25-24.05);p=0.03)的治疗失败风险显著增加。即使经过适当治疗的手术部位感染,植入物的存活率仍严重受损,但在前 24 个月内逐渐下降。

相似文献

1
Implant survival after deep infection of an instrumented spinal fusion.器械辅助脊柱融合术后深部感染的种植体存活率。
Bone Joint J. 2013 Aug;95-B(8):1121-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.30784.
2
Management of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery.脊柱内固定手术后迟发性深部手术部位感染的处理
BMC Surg. 2018 Dec 22;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0458-4.
3
Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment outcomes.后路脊柱内固定术后手术伤口感染:长期治疗结果分析
Eur Spine J. 2015 Mar;24(3):561-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3636-9. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
4
Retrospective study of deep surgical site infections following spinal surgery and the effectiveness of continuous irrigation.脊柱手术后深部手术部位感染及持续冲洗效果的回顾性研究
Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Oct;25(5):621-4. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2010.546902.
5
The management and outcome of spinal implant infections: contemporary retrospective cohort study.脊柱植入物感染的管理与结局:当代回顾性队列研究
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr 1;44(7):913-20. doi: 10.1086/512194. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
6
Risk factors for implant removal after spinal surgical site infection.脊柱手术部位感染后取出植入物的风险因素。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Oct;27(10):2481-2490. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5294-1. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
7
Management of deep wound infection after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages.椎间融合器后路腰椎椎间融合术后深部伤口感染的处理
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Apr;20(2):127-31. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211266.66615.e5.
8
Does Acute placement of instrumentation in the treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis predispose to recurrent infection: long-term follow-up in immune-suppressed patients.在椎体骨髓炎治疗中急性置入器械是否易导致反复感染:免疫抑制患者的长期随访
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2089-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181839b9c.
9
Analysis of instrumentation/fusion survivorship without reoperation after primary posterior multiple anchor instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis.原发性后路多枚内固定融合术后再次手术前的仪器使用/融合存活率分析。
Spine J. 2010 Jan;10(1):5-15. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.460. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
10
Management of infection after instrumented posterior spine fusion in pediatric scoliosis.小儿脊柱侧弯后路器械融合术后感染的管理
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):2739-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5a86.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Limitations of Continuous Local Antibiotic Perfusion in Treating Surgical Site Infections Following Instrumented Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.持续局部抗生素灌注治疗脊柱内固定手术后手术部位感染的疗效及局限性:一项回顾性多中心研究
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Feb;14(2):421-431. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01095-x. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
2
Is Aggressive Surgery Always Necessary for Suspected Early-Onset Surgical Site Infection after Lumbar Surgery? A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis.腰椎手术后疑似早期手术部位感染时,激进手术总是必要的吗?一项10年回顾性分析。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(8):1884-1892. doi: 10.1111/os.14106. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
3
Removal of Spinal Instrumentation Is Not Required to Successfully Treat Postoperative Wound Infections in Most Cases.
在大多数情况下,成功治疗术后伤口感染并不需要移除脊柱内固定器械。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 18;16(3):e56380. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56380. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Surgical Site Infection After Polymethyl Methacrylate Pedicle Screw Augmentation in Osteoporotic Spinal Vertebrae: A Series of 537 Cases.聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯椎弓根螺钉强化骨质疏松性椎体后的手术部位感染:537例病例系列
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):587-597. doi: 10.14444/8474. Epub 2023 May 22.
5
Spinal Cord Stimulation in Special Populations: Best Practices from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience to Improve Safety and Efficacy.特殊人群中的脊髓刺激:美国疼痛与神经科学学会的最佳实践以提高安全性和有效性。
J Pain Res. 2022 Oct 19;15:3263-3273. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S372921. eCollection 2022.
6
A narrative review of infection prevention techniques in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery.成人及儿童脊柱畸形手术中感染预防技术的叙述性综述。
J Spine Surg. 2021 Sep;7(3):413-421. doi: 10.21037/jss-21-10.
7
Incidence, Management and Outcome of Delayed Deep Surgical Site Infection Following Spinal Deformity Surgery: 20-Year Experience at a Single Institution.脊柱畸形手术后迟发性深部手术部位感染的发生率、管理及结局:单机构20年经验
Global Spine J. 2022 Jul;12(6):1141-1150. doi: 10.1177/2192568220978225. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
8
Complications rate of and risk factors for the unplanned reoperation of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in elderly patients: a retrospective single-Centre cohort study of 33 patients.老年退变性腰椎滑脱症患者计划性翻修手术的并发症发生率和危险因素:一项回顾性单中心 33 例患者队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01717-2.
9
Implant-Associated Infection of Long-Segment Spinal Instrumentation: A Retrospective Analysis of 46 Consecutive Patients.长节段脊柱内固定相关感染:46例连续患者的回顾性分析
Asian Spine J. 2021 Apr;15(2):234-243. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0391. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
10
Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study.脊柱植入物相关感染采用或不采用抗生物膜抗生素治疗的结果:一项为期 10 年的队列研究结果。
Infection. 2020 Aug;48(4):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2. Epub 2020 May 5.