Gotfredsen A, Riis B J, Christiansen C, Rødbro P
Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup Hospital, Denmark.
Clin Rheumatol. 1990 Jun;9(2):193-203. doi: 10.1007/BF02031968.
Regional bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) (head, arms, chest, spine, pelvis, legs) of a total body dual photon 153Gd absorptiometry (DPA) scan were measured in 20 healthy postmenopausal women, 27 postmenopausal women with hip fracture, and 17 postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis of the hip. In addition, local BMC and BMD were measured in the proximal and distal regions of the distal forearm (BMCprox, BMDprox, BMCdist, BMDdist) by single photon absorptiometry (SPA); and in the lumbar spine (BMCL2-L4 and BMDL2-L4) by 153Gd DPA. The overall impression was a reduction of bone mass in hip fracture patients compared with healthy controls and an increase in the bone mass of osteoarthritic patients. These results were valid using both regional values of the total body scan, and local forearm and lumbar spine measurements, and statistically significant using one-way analysis of variance. There were, however, also significant within-group between-region differences (one-way analysis of variance), showing that the bone mass of the pelvis and legs in hip fracture patients was more reduced than in the remaining skeleton; in osteoarthritic patients it was not increased but rather unchanged or slightly reduced. The differences between the level of the three local measurements (BMDprox BMDdist BMDL2-L4), on the one hand, and the level of the six regional BMD values, on the other hand, were investigated by the two-way analysis of variance: local measurements = rows; regional values = columns. This analysis showed that none of the three local measurements was statistically better than the other two in predicting the overall level of skeletal bone mass as judged by the six regional values. We conclude that serious osteoporotic bone loss has a generalized nature, however, with a tendency towards lower values in the regions affected by fracture (viz: low bone mass in the legs of femoral neck fracture patients). Osteoarthritis may be associated with a high bone mass in most areas, but low values in the affected regions. Local lumbar spine measurement of bone mass by DPA is not superior to local forearm measurement of bone mass by SPA in predicting the nature of overall osteoporotic or osteoarthritic bone change.
对20名健康绝经后女性、27名绝经后髋部骨折女性和17名绝经后髋骨关节炎女性进行了全身双光子153钆吸收法(DPA)扫描,测量其局部骨矿物质含量(BMC)和密度(BMD)(头部、手臂、胸部、脊柱、骨盆、腿部)。此外,通过单光子吸收法(SPA)测量远端前臂近端和远端区域的局部BMC和BMD(BMCprox、BMDprox、BMCdist、BMDdist);通过153钆DPA测量腰椎的BMC(BMCL2-L4)和BMD(BMDL2-L4)。总体印象是,与健康对照组相比,髋部骨折患者的骨量减少,而骨关节炎患者的骨量增加。使用全身扫描的局部值以及局部前臂和腰椎测量值时,这些结果均有效,并且通过单因素方差分析具有统计学意义。然而,组内区域间也存在显著差异(单因素方差分析),表明髋部骨折患者骨盆和腿部的骨量比其余骨骼减少得更多;在骨关节炎患者中,骨量并未增加,而是保持不变或略有减少。通过双向方差分析研究了一方面三个局部测量值(BMDprox、BMDdist、BMDL2-L4)的水平与另一方面六个区域BMD值的水平之间的差异:局部测量值=行;区域值=列。该分析表明,根据六个区域值判断,在预测骨骼骨量的总体水平方面,三个局部测量值中没有一个在统计学上优于其他两个。我们得出结论,严重的骨质疏松性骨丢失具有全身性,然而,在受骨折影响的区域有值较低的趋势(即:股骨颈骨折患者腿部骨量低)。骨关节炎可能在大多数区域与高骨量相关,但在受影响区域骨量较低。在预测总体骨质疏松或骨关节炎性骨变化的性质方面,通过DPA进行的局部腰椎骨量测量并不优于通过SPA进行的局部前臂骨量测量。