INSERM, U1012 , Le Kremlin-Bicêtre , France ; Université Paris-SUD, UMR-S1012 , Le Kremlin-Bicêtre , France ; Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals , Geneva , Switzerland.
Front Immunol. 2013 Jul 30;4:215. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00215. eCollection 2013.
The role of CD4+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been an area of intensive investigation and remains a matter of ardent debate. Investigation and interpretation suffered from uncertainties concerning Treg quantification. Firstly, Treg quantification and function in HIV infection remain controversial in part because of the lack of reliable and specific markers to identify human Tregs. Secondly, analyzing Treg percentages or absolute numbers led to apparent discrepancies that are now solved: it is now commonly accepted that Treg are targets of HIV infection, but are preferentially preserved compared to conventional CD4 T cells. Moreover, the duality of immune defects associated to HIV infection, i.e., low grade chronic inflammation and defects in HIV-specific responses also casts doubts on the potential impact of Treg on HIV infection. Tregs may be beneficial or/and detrimental to the control of HIV infection by suppressing chronic inflammation or HIV-specific responses respectively. Indeed both effects of Treg suppression have been described in HIV infection. The discovery in recent years of the existence of phenotypically and functionally distinct human CD4+FOXP3+ Treg subsets may provide a unique opportunity to reconcile these contrasting results. It is tempting to speculate that different Treg subsets exert these different suppressive effects. This review summarizes available data concerning Treg fate during HIV infection when considering Treg globally or as subsets. We discuss how the identification of naïve and effector Treg subsets modulates our understanding of Treg biology during HIV infection and the potential impact of HIV infection on mechanisms governing peripheral differentiation of adaptive Tregs.
CD4+FOXP3+调节性 T 细胞(Treg)在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染中的作用一直是一个深入研究的领域,也是一个激烈争论的问题。由于缺乏可靠和特定的标志物来识别人类 Treg,对 Treg 的定量检测和功能的研究和解释受到了不确定性的影响。首先,Treg 在 HIV 感染中的定量和功能仍然存在争议,部分原因是缺乏可靠和特定的标志物来识别人类 Tregs。其次,分析 Treg 的百分比或绝对数量导致了明显的差异,现在已经得到解决:现在普遍认为 Treg 是 HIV 感染的靶点,但与常规 CD4 T 细胞相比,Treg 更优先被保留。此外,与 HIV 感染相关的免疫缺陷的双重性,即低度慢性炎症和 HIV 特异性反应的缺陷,也使人对 Treg 对 HIV 感染的潜在影响产生怀疑。Treg 可能通过抑制慢性炎症或 HIV 特异性反应,对 HIV 感染的控制产生有益或/和有害的影响。事实上,在 HIV 感染中已经描述了 Treg 抑制的这两种作用。近年来发现,人类 CD4+FOXP3+Treg 亚群存在表型和功能上的差异,这为调和这些相互矛盾的结果提供了一个独特的机会。人们不禁推测,不同的 Treg 亚群发挥了这些不同的抑制作用。本综述总结了在考虑 Treg 作为整体或亚群时,在 HIV 感染期间 Treg 命运的相关数据。我们讨论了如何识别幼稚和效应 Treg 亚群,调节我们对 HIV 感染期间 Treg 生物学的理解,以及 HIV 感染对调节适应性 Treg 外周分化的机制的潜在影响。