• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A role for judges in assisted dying.法官在协助死亡中的角色。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2009 May 30;2:3. Print 2009.
2
A role for doctors in assisted dying? An analysis of legal regulations and medical professional positions in six European countries.医生在协助死亡中应扮演何种角色?对六个欧洲国家法律法规及医学专业立场的分析。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jan;34(1):28-32. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.018911.
3
The end of life decisions -- should physicians aid their patients in dying?临终决策——医生应该协助病人死亡吗?
J Clin Forensic Med. 2004 Jun;11(3):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcfm.2003.11.002.
4
Alternatives to physician-assisted suicide.医生协助自杀的替代方案。
Am J Otolaryngol. 1995 May-Jun;16(3):181-5. doi: 10.1016/0196-0709(95)90099-3.
5
Euthanasia and assisted suicide: comparison of legal aspects in Switzerland and other countries.安乐死与协助自杀:瑞士及其他国家法律层面的比较
Med Sci Law. 2006 Oct;46(4):287-94. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.46.4.287.
6
Legalisation of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide: survey of doctors' attitudes.安乐死或医师协助自杀合法化:医生态度调查。
Palliat Med. 2009 Apr;23(3):205-12. doi: 10.1177/0269216308102041.
7
Assisted suicide: Models of legal regulation in selected European countries and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.协助自杀:部分欧洲国家的法律监管模式及欧洲人权法院的判例法
Med Sci Law. 2015 Oct;55(4):246-58. doi: 10.1177/0025802414540636. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
8
Euthanasia and medically assisted suicide--the case for legalizing physician assisted suicide.安乐死与医疗协助自杀——医师协助自杀合法化的理由
Med Law. 2001;20(3):451-62.
9
The Role of the Medical Profession in Victorian Assisted Dying Law Reform.医学专业在维多利亚时代安乐死法律改革中的作用。
J Law Med. 2018 Oct;26(1):246-264.
10
[Euthanasia and/or medically assisted suicide: Reflection on the new responsibility of the hospital pharmacist].[安乐死和/或医疗协助自杀:关于医院药剂师新职责的思考]
Ann Pharm Fr. 2014 Mar;72(2):82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
A role for doctors in assisted dying? An analysis of legal regulations and medical professional positions in six European countries.医生在协助死亡中应扮演何种角色?对六个欧洲国家法律法规及医学专业立场的分析。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jan;34(1):28-32. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.018911.
2
Euthanasia in intensive care: a 56-year-old man with a pontine hemorrhage resulting in a locked-in syndrome.重症监护中的安乐死:一名56岁男性因脑桥出血导致闭锁综合征。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):2428-30. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000281854.12364.f5.
3
Deliberate termination of life of newborns with spina bifida, a critical reappraisal.对患有脊柱裂新生儿故意终止生命的批判性重新评估。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 Jan;24(1):13-28; discussion 29-56. doi: 10.1007/s00381-007-0478-3. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
4
What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a qualitative study.濒临死亡者对安乐死和协助自杀的看法:一项定性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Dec;32(12):706-10. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.015883.
5
Trends in acceptance of euthanasia among the general public in 12 European countries (1981-1999).12个欧洲国家(1981 - 1999年)公众对安乐死的接受趋势。
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Dec;16(6):663-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl042. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
6
The acceptability of ending a patient's life.结束患者生命的可接受性。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jun;31(6):311-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.008664.
7
Under what conditions is euthanasia acceptable to lay people and health professionals?在何种情况下,安乐死对于普通民众和医疗专业人员而言是可以接受的?
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jan;60(2):357-68. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.016.
8
When is physician assisted suicide or euthanasia acceptable?医生协助自杀或安乐死在何时是可以接受的?
J Med Ethics. 2003 Dec;29(6):330-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.6.330.
9
Non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia in The Netherlands: Dutch perspectives.荷兰的非自愿和非主动安乐死:荷兰人的观点。
Issues Law Med. 2003 Spring;18(3):239-57.

法官在协助死亡中的角色。

A role for judges in assisted dying.

作者信息

Castelló Ana, Francès Francesc, Verdú Fernando

机构信息

Professor of Legal Medicine, Department of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia EG, Spain.

出版信息

J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2009 May 30;2:3. Print 2009.

PMID:23908717
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3713891/
Abstract

Medically provoked death, whether euthanasia or assisted suicide, is a common issue for discussion in various forums, participants coming from widely differing fields of knowledge, among who are, of course, doctors. Substantial legal differences exist in Europe on this issue and in an ever-wider Europe, it is essential, for practical reasons, that legislation be standardised. We would like to propose possible regulations that would provide effective safeguards in the application of euthanasia or assisted suicide.

摘要

无论是安乐死还是协助自杀,医学诱导死亡都是各个论坛上常见的讨论话题,参与者来自广泛不同的知识领域,其中当然包括医生。在欧洲,关于这个问题存在重大的法律差异,而且在范围不断扩大的欧洲,出于实际原因,使立法标准化至关重要。我们想提出一些可能的规定,这些规定将在安乐死或协助自杀的实施中提供有效的保障措施。